Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Nightforce glass vs. Zeiss & Swarovski |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||
Mike VS
Optics GrassHopper Joined: December/15/2008 Location: PA. Status: Offline Points: 29 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: December/16/2008 at 16:52 |
|
I was wondering if anyone can provide feedback on how Nightforce glass compares to the Ziess Diavari's and Swarovski PH's and Z6's? Is Nightforce close or not even in the same ballpark from a glass quality (brightness, clarity, distrotion) standpoint? Thanks.
|
||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Welcome to OT, Mike!
I have all of the above except the Swaro Z6. Nightforce glass is quite good in my opinion, but not in the same class as Zeiss & Swaro. IMO, and others will likely disagree, it's really not that far behind, when you consider the power range and compare directly to the Euro glass of similar power range. Most of NF scopes are high magnification variables, and higher magnification amplifies any optical aberrations. Beyond a certain quality level, you don't gain a huge improvement in optical performance relative to the increase in cost. No doubt that Zeiss Diavari and Swaro are better, though. NF glass compares favorably to the Zeiss Conquest, though. Edited by RifleDude - December/16/2008 at 17:58 |
||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||
Mojo
Optics Journeyman All Mojo Joined: December/26/2007 Location: Wisconsin Status: Offline Points: 482 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Welcome to the OT Mike. Ted better get with the program with a Z6. You have a boatload of cash there Ted, and you are probably just waiting for the right rifle?
|
||
MOJO
|
||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Really?!!! Where?!!!
|
||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||
pyro6999
Optics Retard OT TITAN Joined: December/22/2006 Location: North Dakota Status: Offline Points: 22034 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
yeah ted you should put a new z6 on your (cough cough) .338fed
|
||
They call me "Boots"
375H&H Mag: Yeah, it kills stuff "extra dead" 343 we will never forget God Bless Chris Ledoux "good ride cowboy" |
||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
What... (cough, cough) are you talking about?
|
||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||
mike650
Optics God Joined: May/14/2006 Location: West of Rockies Status: Offline Points: 14569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
|
||
pyro6999
Optics Retard OT TITAN Joined: December/22/2006 Location: North Dakota Status: Offline Points: 22034 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
oh uh cough cough i was thinking of somebody else my bad!
|
||
They call me "Boots"
375H&H Mag: Yeah, it kills stuff "extra dead" 343 we will never forget God Bless Chris Ledoux "good ride cowboy" |
||
Mojo
Optics Journeyman All Mojo Joined: December/26/2007 Location: Wisconsin Status: Offline Points: 482 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Thought that it was you for sure that snapped up that Z6 that Chris had on sale!
|
||
MOJO
|
||
hunter12345
Optics Journeyman Joined: November/21/2007 Status: Offline Points: 470 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Night Force lens are made in Japan with glass comparable to the Nikon Monarch Gold.Of course its good but not in the same league as Zeiss or the Swaro.
|
||
Rancid Coolaid
MODERATOR Joined: January/19/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9318 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The glass is Japanese, but far superior, in my opinion, to anything Nikon makes. Nightforce (not F1 series)has good glass, their real value is in durability and repeatability. Their glass is not as good as the best Zeiss and Swaro, but still very good. I've owned Nikon Monarch and looked through the new Monarch Golds, to say Nightforce is comparable means you looked through a crap Nightforce or an amazing Monarch. Glass-wise, Nightforce's older stuff (or non-F1) isn't in the same category with best Swaro and Zeiss, I'd say it is in with IOR (but with much better internals than IOR.) Nightforce makes a damn fine scope, very durable, good glass, and great internals. Also, their reticle selection is fantastic. The only negatives to Nightforce: 1. Theya re not sold by SWFA - this is a big deal, Chris takes care of his custoemrs. 2. The illumination system is good, but a real pain to change. 3. As you change power, the entire ocular spins, putting the button on your Butler Creek in different places depending on power. Just FYI. Even with these, I've bought Nightforce and will by again! Now, the F1 series (FFP reticle, zero stop) , the glass in it is every bit as good as the best Euro glass. But it is also $2,500, so it better be damn good. |
||
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn. Equality is something you whine about not being given. |
||
Sparky
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: July/15/2007 Location: SD Status: Offline Points: 4569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
RifleDude's comments I think are quite accurate and well thought out. And in my experience I agree. I do how ever feel that the NF is a step or two above the Nikon's though.
For another perspective. You might want to take a look at the SWFA scope rating scale. http://www.opticstalk.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=8185 |
||
Sparky
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: July/15/2007 Location: SD Status: Offline Points: 4569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Well if I had waited a few minutes I would not have felt the need to reply since Rancid said it all. And very well I might add.
|
||
Mike VS
Optics GrassHopper Joined: December/15/2008 Location: PA. Status: Offline Points: 29 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Thanks for the invite to the forum and your insites on my question!
|
||
Jon A
Optics Journeyman Joined: March/14/2008 Location: Everett, WA Status: Offline Points: 670 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
OK, the vs. IOR "observations" have been done to death, but I've got to ask:
How did you come up with that? Do you have one, to what have you compared it and how? The only comparo I've seen so far is the thread on SH where a whole bunch of people compared one to a Premier, side by side. Every single last one of them, including the NF fans, felt the glass was better in the Premier. When something (that many often claim is subjective without instrumentation) is agreed upon by every single person that compares, that really means it was no contest--the difference between the two must have been blatantly obvious. They're nice scopes, but the guy is asking for information--specifically on glass quality. $2500 is a lot of money. If somebody dropped that much on one because I said its glass was as good as S&B or top level Zeiss...hopefully I wouldn't need to go into hiding.... |
||
Kickboxer
MODERATOR Moderator Joined: February/13/2008 Status: Offline Points: 23679 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Not to change the subject, BUT, I guess I am changing the subject. JonA, there is a nice NEW forum topic.. THE RANGE REPORT... designed specifically for a FULL SCALE, DETAILED report on the Premier Heritage....
Know anyone who has one?????????
|
||
Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.
There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living |
||
Sparky
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: July/15/2007 Location: SD Status: Offline Points: 4569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
How many is a whole bunch? |
||
Rancid Coolaid
MODERATOR Joined: January/19/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9318 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I've read the SH opinions, and mostly agree. They compared the Premier (maybe that thread, maybe another) with S&B and said the glass in the Premier was at least as good as the S&B and probably a little better (I don't yet own Premier, have looked through one side-by-side with PM2 and agree with the statements.)
I said it was as good as Euro glass ("tactical Euro glass" was inferred) thus making the F1 on par with S&B but not as good as the Premier. Another note of interest: I don't yet count Premier as anything since it just came out and is not proven. The Nightforce is a known value with a well-earned track record. lastly, glass quality is subjective, I know. I know a few with Heritage and have compared, side-by-side with S&B, USO, and Nightforce, and the glass at that level is tough to call - but the Heritage looked damn nice. I have no reluctance in recommending the F1 (if you can get one) and would relay my experiences with the Premier (limited as they are) but cannot recommend it yet - too new. However, new as the Premier is, I will own one soon! Maybe the new 5-25 coming out in Spring 09. |
||
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn. Equality is something you whine about not being given. |
||
Dale Clifford
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: July/04/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 5087 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I think the guys only talking about hunting scopes, so bringing in high end tacticals is somewhat pointless-- which brings the only scope in the hunting catagory of NF to compare or their new 2.5x10x33 (?) which really isn't a fair comparison. If you compare NF bench models its still apples and oranges because of such features as zoom ratio, AO, reticle subtensions etc.
|
||
Jon A
Optics Journeyman Joined: March/14/2008 Location: Everett, WA Status: Offline Points: 670 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
OK, first how do you know the glass in the Premier is not "Euro?" You don't. Secondly, I have compared the Premier with S&B and I and everybody else I know of who has say it's really damn close. The Premier might be a tiny bit better but they are so close it is really, really, hard to even tell them appart, much less declare a definitive winner. If you think the comparo would have gone from unanimous to anything but had the Premier been swapped with a S&B, you're fooling yourself. And the OP. |
||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |