Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Nikon Monarch or Weaver Grand Slam? |
Post Reply |
Author | |
DAVE44
Optics Journeyman Joined: November/11/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 652 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: January/02/2005 at 03:44 |
I have read that a lot of people like the Nikon Monarchs while at the same time many like the Weaver Grand Slams. I have seen a lot of Nikon Monarchs on ebay listed as new in the box and priced less than a Weaver Grand Slam can be purchased for. Which would be the better overall scope in the brightness, resoloution and holding its zero areas? With the price being the same which scope is worth that price?
Edited by DAVE44 |
|
cheaptrick
MODERATOR Joined: September/27/2004 Location: South Carolina Status: Offline Points: 20844 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have seen a Grand Slam once. Nice scope. I was flat impressed. But, the Monarch is a favorite scope of mine now. Nikon has given friends great customer service, the scope is a steal for the money spent.
I don't think you could go wrong either way though.
|
|
If at first you don't secede...try..try again.
|
|
Grubbs
Optics Apprentice Joined: August/18/2004 Status: Offline Points: 134 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Another vote here for the Monarch.
|
|
Chris Farris
TEAM SWFA - Admin swfa.com Joined: October/01/2003 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 8024 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I think they are very close with a slight edge going to the Weaver because of the famed Micro-Trac adjustments they use. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |