Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Fullfield vs Signature |
Post Reply |
Author | |
obi-wan
Optics Apprentice Joined: November/23/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 34 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: December/24/2004 at 14:59 |
What is the difference between these 2 scopes and do either of them stand up to the bushnell 4200?
|
|
redneckbmxer24
Optics Master Joined: June/02/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1055 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
the signature has better lense coatings than the FF2, so it will be more brighter, and i think that about it, but i think the 4200 is superior to both, but for the price, the FF2 cannot be beat.
cory |
|
If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns, I'll be only one of millions!!!
|
|
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13181 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Signature has absolutely identical lens coating to Fullfield II (according to Burris). The difference is in the erector tube and lens polishing. That makes Signature (or more modern Signature Select) a considerably better scope than the Fullfield II.
I'd take Signature Select over Elite 4200 although Elite's Rainguard coating would make me think about it.
Ilya |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |