New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Scope for Tikka T3 Lite 270 WSM
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Scope for Tikka T3 Lite 270 WSM

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
newbee View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/23/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18
  Quote newbee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Scope for Tikka T3 Lite 270 WSM
    Posted: July/23/2008 at 09:39
Hello all!  I've been lurking for awhile, researching, trying to figure out what to put on my new rifle.  My budget is sub $500.  It will be used primarily for hunting deer, antelope and coyotes, maybe some groundhogs too.  Mostly 300 yards or less, possibly an occasional 400 yarder.

I'm strongly looking at the Bushnell 4200's.  My big question is this, is it worth my money to get the 4-16AO vs. the 3-9?  I've never had an AO before so I'm not sure if it's worth it.

I should also add that I haven't completely ruled out the Nikon Monarch with BDC.  Then I could get the 3-12SF.  The rainguard really has me leaning towards the Bushnell though.

Any and all thoughts/suggestions are appreciated, thanks!
Back to Top
Big Squeeze View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar
GOOGLE NINJA

Joined: August/30/2007
Location: Anaheim, Calif.
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3143
  Quote Big Squeeze Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/23/2008 at 10:35
Originally posted by newbee

Hello all!  I've been lurking for awhile, researching, trying to figure out what to put on my new rifle.  My budget is sub $500.  It will be used primarily for hunting deer, antelope and coyotes, maybe some groundhogs too.  Mostly 300 yards or less, possibly an occasional 400 yarder.

I'm strongly looking at the Bushnell 4200's.  My big question is this, is it worth my money to get the 4-16AO vs. the 3-9?  I've never had an AO before so I'm not sure if it's worth it.

I should also add that I haven't completely ruled out the Nikon Monarch with BDC.  Then I could get the 3-12SF.  The rainguard really has me leaning towards the Bushnell though.

Any and all thoughts/suggestions are appreciated, thanks!
..........It all depends. For overall usage a 4x16, which can be used on your 270, is a bit much, unless you`re going to be hunting groundhogs. or smaller varmits most of the time.
 
For deer and antelope out to 300-400 yards, nothing wrong with a 3x9, especially in a 4200. I nailed a 302 lb. hog @ 342 yards (1 shot) with my 300 WSM. My former 3x9 4200 was mounted on it at the time, which was sighted in @ a 300 yard zero. If I remember correctly, that scope was set on 8x for that shot!.....(You gotta love those ARC rangefinders!!)
 
For a longer range, flat shooting 270 WSM, some would prefer a higher variable than a 3x9. But then on the downside, you`ll get into more expense and more scope/rifle weight. With advantages gained, there are always dis-advantages as well to consider.
 
For the money though, the 3x9 4200 w/ Rainguard (great for any weather) @ only $249,, cannot be beat! Great scope for the bucs, with a great overall 3x9 hunting variable! Wink     
300 WSM/375 Ruger....."All science, is truly the study of God`s wonderful work!"..."Bad news for liberals, is good news for America!".."What liberals hate, I love!".."What liberals like, I despise!"
Back to Top
supertool73 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar

Joined: January/03/2008
Location: Utah
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3725
  Quote supertool73 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/23/2008 at 10:51
+1 on the 3-9x 4200, outstanding scopes.  Plus with all the money you save you can buy ammo or spend it on a hunting trip. 

I have been hunting big game with 3-9x scopes for 15 years and have never felt under scoped for any shot I have taken.  I think it is a very good power range for most types of hunting.
Back to Top
Rancid Coolaid View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2677
  Quote Rancid Coolaid Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/23/2008 at 11:02
I have the same rifle (Tikka T3 lite in .270) and love it, very accurate, very fast-handling.

For the shooting you specify, I would go with the 3-9; it'll be smaller and lighter than the 4-16.  And adjustable objectives will only slow things down on a short- to mid-range rifle such as yours.

I have taken a hog or 2 with my Tikka .270 and they sometimes run, but not far.  It is a great gun.

Also, take the rings that came on the rifle and throw them away, don't keep them (you might be tempted to one day use them.)  they are pure garbage.  I recommend Talleys for Tikkas, the base is integral to the lower ring section and they are strong and well-made.

Enjoy!

(By the way, I mounted my Tikka with a Swaro 3.5-10 with their ballistic reticule - best hunting scope I own, no question - fits perfectly, and clear and bright as can be.)
To a hammer, everything is a nail
Back to Top
newbee View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/23/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18
  Quote newbee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/23/2008 at 16:04
Thank you all for the responses.  I was really leaning towards that 3-9 so hearing some more experts recommend it eases my mind!

As far the rings, I will trash the Tikka's.  I was leaning toward the Leupold's, but I will check out the Tally's.  Got any links for some good ones for a Tikka? 
Back to Top
martin3175 View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: Maryland
Online Status: Online
Posts: 2607
  Quote martin3175 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/23/2008 at 17:37
Back to Top
sholling View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: May/24/2008
Location: Hemet CA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 545
  Quote sholling Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/23/2008 at 17:44
The Tikka rings work ok but I replaced mine with a DNZ (formerly DedNutz) combination rings and base. I like the look better and they don't need to be lapped.

This this the DNZ on one of my 10/22s...


This is a DNZ in my T3 Lite...


NRA life member and darn proud of it!
Old age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill. ;)
Back to Top
newbee View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/23/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18
  Quote newbee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/24/2008 at 08:17
sholling, those look great and I think that's the style I want, thanks for the pics!

martin, I was hoping for something a little more specific. 
Back to Top
3_tens View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: January/08/2007
Location: Oklahoma
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2061
  Quote 3_tens Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/24/2008 at 08:44
Originally posted by sholling

The Tikka rings work ok but I replaced mine with a DNZ (formerly DedNutz) combination rings and base. I like the look better and they don't need to be lapped.

This this the DNZ on one of my 10/22s...


This is a DNZ in my T3 Lite...


Those are both good looking setups Thanks for the pics. I have never seen these rings before but they look very strong. The stainless is a better than most color match with your combination.
Need to follow the rules. Just hard to determine which set of rules to follow
Back to Top
Mojo View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar
All Mojo

Joined: December/26/2007
Location: Wisconsin
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 478
  Quote Mojo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/24/2008 at 20:48
Just picked up my Tikka T3 Lite yesterday, in .308.  Had it on lay-away after a Kahles scope buying binge.  Looked at Warne Steel Permanent Mounts, but they were too heavy and not needed for the caliber I have.  They were nice looking though.
 
I would go with the advice on the 3-9 Buschnell 4200.  The 4-16 is going to look too big on that rifle.  I am on the outer edge with my 3.5-10X50 Kahles KX, and some will think that is too big.
 
I will be using Talley Lightweight  Scope Mounts that are combination rings that sit right on top of the integral mount of the Tikka.  They are roughly 3.5 oz., and half the weight of the Warne steel mounts.
 
Good luck on your choice!
 
Mojo  
 
 
MOJO
Back to Top
newbee View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: July/23/2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 18
  Quote newbee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/25/2008 at 08:32


Mojo, is that the mount you're talking about?  It looks good, but is it strong?  Anyone else using this type?

Also, I was under the impression that the Tikka's were dove-tail mounted.  Are they also drilled?

Back to Top
Ed Connelly View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
Mui Grande Cucharacha

Joined: December/16/2007
Location: USA
Online Status: Online
Posts: 12780
  Quote Ed Connelly Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/25/2008 at 08:40
Originally posted by newbee



Mojo, is that the mount you're talking about?  It looks good, but is it strong?  Anyone else using this type?

Also, I was under the impression that the Tikka's were dove-tail mounted.  Are they also drilled?

 
Well, THAT sure looks strong to me!!  Bucky
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.