![]() |
|
Scope for Tikka T3 Lite 270 WSM |
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Author | |
newbee
Optics GrassHopper
Joined: July/23/2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 18 |
Quote Reply
Topic: Scope for Tikka T3 Lite 270 WSMPosted: July/23/2008 at 09:39 |
|
Hello all! I've been lurking for awhile, researching, trying to figure out what to put on my new rifle. My budget is sub $500. It will be used primarily for hunting deer, antelope and coyotes, maybe some groundhogs too. Mostly 300 yards or less, possibly an occasional 400 yarder.
I'm strongly looking at the Bushnell 4200's. My big question is this, is it worth my money to get the 4-16AO vs. the 3-9? I've never had an AO before so I'm not sure if it's worth it. I should also add that I haven't completely ruled out the Nikon Monarch with BDC. Then I could get the 3-12SF. The rainguard really has me leaning towards the Bushnell though. Any and all thoughts/suggestions are appreciated, thanks! |
|
![]() |
|
Big Squeeze
Optics Master Extraordinaire
GOOGLE NINJA Joined: August/30/2007 Location: Anaheim, Calif. Online Status: Offline Posts: 3143 |
Quote Reply
Posted: July/23/2008 at 10:35 |
For deer and antelope out to 300-400 yards, nothing wrong with a 3x9, especially in a 4200. I nailed a 302 lb. hog @ 342 yards (1 shot) with my 300 WSM. My former 3x9 4200 was mounted on it at the time, which was sighted in @ a 300 yard zero. If I remember correctly, that scope was set on 8x for that shot!.....(You gotta love those ARC rangefinders!!)
For a longer range, flat shooting 270 WSM, some would prefer a higher variable than a 3x9. But then on the downside, you`ll get into more expense and more scope/rifle weight. With advantages gained, there are always dis-advantages as well to consider.
For the money though, the 3x9 4200 w/ Rainguard (great for any weather) @ only $249,, cannot be beat! Great scope for the bucs, with a great overall 3x9 hunting variable!
|
|
|
300 WSM/375 Ruger....."All science, is truly the study of God`s wonderful work!"..."Bad news for liberals, is good news for America!".."What liberals hate, I love!".."What liberals like, I despise!"
|
|
![]() |
|
supertool73
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Joined: January/03/2008 Location: Utah Online Status: Offline Posts: 3725 |
Quote Reply
Posted: July/23/2008 at 10:51 |
|
+1 on the 3-9x 4200, outstanding scopes. Plus with all the money you save you can buy ammo or spend it on a hunting trip.
I have been hunting big game with 3-9x scopes for 15 years and have never felt under scoped for any shot I have taken. I think it is a very good power range for most types of hunting. |
|
![]() |
|
Rancid Coolaid
Optics Master
Joined: January/19/2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2677 |
Quote Reply
Posted: July/23/2008 at 11:02 |
|
I have the same rifle (Tikka T3 lite in .270) and love it, very accurate, very fast-handling.
For the shooting you specify, I would go with the 3-9; it'll be smaller and lighter than the 4-16. And adjustable objectives will only slow things down on a short- to mid-range rifle such as yours. I have taken a hog or 2 with my Tikka .270 and they sometimes run, but not far. It is a great gun. Also, take the rings that came on the rifle and throw them away, don't keep them (you might be tempted to one day use them.) they are pure garbage. I recommend Talleys for Tikkas, the base is integral to the lower ring section and they are strong and well-made. Enjoy! (By the way, I mounted my Tikka with a Swaro 3.5-10 with their ballistic reticule - best hunting scope I own, no question - fits perfectly, and clear and bright as can be.) |
|
|
To a hammer, everything is a nail
|
|
![]() |
|
newbee
Optics GrassHopper
Joined: July/23/2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 18 |
Quote Reply
Posted: July/23/2008 at 16:04 |
|
Thank you all for the responses. I was really leaning towards that 3-9 so hearing some more experts recommend it eases my mind!
As far the rings, I will trash the Tikka's. I was leaning toward the Leupold's, but I will check out the Tally's. Got any links for some good ones for a Tikka? |
|
![]() |
|
martin3175
Optics Master
Joined: January/19/2005 Location: Maryland Online Status: Online Posts: 2607 |
Quote Reply
Posted: July/23/2008 at 17:37 |
![]() |
|
sholling
Optics Journeyman
Joined: May/24/2008 Location: Hemet CA Online Status: Offline Posts: 545 |
Quote Reply
Posted: July/23/2008 at 17:44 |
|
The Tikka rings work ok but I replaced mine with a DNZ (formerly DedNutz) combination rings and base. I like the look better and they don't need to be lapped.
This this the DNZ on one of my 10/22s... ![]() This is a DNZ in my T3 Lite... ![]() |
|
|
NRA life member and darn proud of it!
Old age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill. ;) |
|
![]() |
|
newbee
Optics GrassHopper
Joined: July/23/2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 18 |
Quote Reply
Posted: July/24/2008 at 08:17 |
|
sholling, those look great and I think that's the style I want, thanks for the pics!
martin, I was hoping for something a little more specific. |
|
![]() |
|
3_tens
Optics Master
Joined: January/08/2007 Location: Oklahoma Online Status: Offline Posts: 2061 |
Quote Reply
Posted: July/24/2008 at 08:44 |
Those are both good looking setups Thanks for the pics. I have never seen these rings before but they look very strong. The stainless is a better than most color match with your combination.
|
|
|
Need to follow the rules. Just hard to determine which set of rules to follow
|
|
![]() |
|
Mojo
Optics Journeyman
All Mojo Joined: December/26/2007 Location: Wisconsin Online Status: Offline Posts: 478 |
Quote Reply
Posted: July/24/2008 at 20:48 |
|
Just picked up my Tikka T3 Lite yesterday, in .308. Had it on lay-away after a Kahles scope buying binge. Looked at Warne Steel Permanent Mounts, but they were too heavy and not needed for the caliber I have. They were nice looking though.
I would go with the advice on the 3-9 Buschnell 4200. The 4-16 is going to look too big on that rifle. I am on the outer edge with my 3.5-10X50 Kahles KX, and some will think that is too big.
I will be using Talley Lightweight Scope Mounts that are combination rings that sit right on top of the integral mount of the Tikka. They are roughly 3.5 oz., and half the weight of the Warne steel mounts.
Good luck on your choice!
Mojo
|
|
|
MOJO
|
|
![]() |
|
newbee
Optics GrassHopper
Joined: July/23/2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 18 |
Quote Reply
Posted: July/25/2008 at 08:32 |
![]() Mojo, is that the mount you're talking about? It looks good, but is it strong? Anyone else using this type? Also, I was under the impression that the Tikka's were dove-tail mounted. Are they also drilled? |
|
![]() |
|
Ed Connelly
Optics Retard
Mui Grande Cucharacha Joined: December/16/2007 Location: USA Online Status: Online Posts: 12780 |
Quote Reply
Posted: July/25/2008 at 08:40 |
Well, THAT sure looks strong to me!!
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |