Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Scope help for new Savage Pred .243 |
Post Reply |
Author | ||||||
Weapon Man
Optics GrassHopper Joined: June/24/2008 Location: Southern USA Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: June/24/2008 at 20:45 |
|||||
Hello to all. I’m new here. I’ve been actively devouring all the good information here (and a few tid-bits elsewhere) for a few weeks. I’ve got a new Savage Predator Hunter .243 Win on order that should be in on Friday. I’m trying to decide on a scope. Primary usage will be coyotes close to longish range (breathing distance to 300 yrds), low light performance is key. It will also do alternate duty as a close in deer rifle and any small varmint elimination opportunity that may present itself, some of which may be longer ranges (400ish yards). Price range is $500-600. Most posts I’ve seen for yote poppers seem to think 2.5-10x50 is the best glass range. I think I would really like the illuminated “dot” reticle option, as long as it is sufficiently dimmable. My short list is made up of these two scopes: http://www.swfa.com/pc-7279-185-bushnell-25-10x50-elite-4200-30mm-rifle-scope.aspx http://www.swfa.com/pc-8146-358-burris-3-12x50-euro-diamond-30mm-rifle-scope.aspx I looked through some various Bushnells, Nikons, Leupolds, and Zeiss Conquests the other day. I was very impressed with the Bushnell 4200 2.5-10x50. I definitely preferred the 50mm obj to smaller (at least based on the darkest spot I could peer into across the street, about 150 yards). They did not have the model I’m considering with the 30mm tube and lighted 4a reticle. I’m assuming it is on par with the 4200 I looked at. They did not have any Burris diamond or Euro diamonds. I like the features of the Euro diamond above. I did look through a Nikon Monarch in 3-12 and I like the bit of extra reach this gives you over the 2.5-10. So that’s a plus for the Burris. I also like that is a wee bit more compact and lighter. The price (value) for the Bushnell 4200 makes it appealing as does the raincote. I’d really like input from anyone who has used or handled these on the adjustability of the illuminated dot in each. Will it go low enough for twilight or bright night hunting (w/ or w/o lights). How does the glass on the Burris compare? The extra price for the Burris is not a deal killer as long as the glass is as good or better and the dot has good adjustment. Not sure if the lack of raincote is a deal killer since I’ve never hunted in the rain. Around here the electricity tends to flow freely when it’s raining. But I can think of times it might help. Any and all input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Weapon Man |
||||||
NRA Life Member
US Air Force Veteran |
||||||
supertool73
Optics God Superstool Joined: January/03/2008 Status: Offline Points: 11814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
Bushnell 4200 are awesome and you will like it. A Trijicon may fit your bill prefectly as well. They are lite by tritium so you never have to worry about batteries. They also have very good glass.
http://www.swfa.com/pc-4422-227-trijicon-3-9x40-accu-point-rifle-scope.aspx |
||||||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
Welcome, Weapon Man!
I think you've chosen well. I love well-designed lit reticle scopes! Both of these scopes feature a small lit dot, rather than the entire reticle being lit, so as long as they have rheostat settings low enough that they don't over-illuminate the sight picture, causing momentary loss of your night vision, either should work well. I've never used a scope from the Euro Diamond series, but I've heard it's the same as the Black Diamond and Signature Select optically. I'm not a huge Burris fan, but I have a few of their scopes and for the most part, they are solid and represent a good value.
That being said, I personally don't think Burris is any better than the Elite 4200 optically, so it's hard to beat the 4200 price. From what I've seen, in general, the 4200s seem to me to have better low light performance than the Burris scopes I've seen, though I can't comment on this aspect of these two scopes. I would be inclined to get the 4200 myself. I think 2.5-10 is a great all-around, do everything power range, though 3-12 is a good magnification range as well.
If you're willing to spend a little extra $, I like Supertool73's suggestion of the Trijicon 3-9X40 as well. It has a very innovative lit reticle system in it that combines fiber optics and tritium for a dual illumination source -- sunlight during the day, tritium lamp during early morning/late evening. Plus, the reticle is very fast and doesn't clutter the sight picture.
Edited by RifleDude - June/25/2008 at 06:46 |
||||||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||||||
mercenary1947
Optics Master ** Joined: April/02/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1392 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
That's quite a jump from $249.00 to $637.00 though . And an IR in bushnell starts at
$ 480.00 ..... 30mm .
Edited by mercenary1947 - June/25/2008 at 21:36 |
||||||
One Shot One Kill .... *S.O.F * Head Shots Only
SWFAM |
||||||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
Merc, that IR 4A version of the Elite 4200 2.5-10 is the one he was considering in his first link above, not the standard version, so the price jump isn't quite that severe.
|
||||||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||||||
Weapon Man
Optics GrassHopper Joined: June/24/2008 Location: Southern USA Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
I did a little more "googling" on these specific scopes. I came up with a few posts on the Burris that said the illumination was too bright for night hunting. Wasn't clear if this was for the digital control version or not.
More troubling was some posts I found from people who had parallax problems with this specific model of Bushnell 4200. I don't know enough to know if this could be just operator error or a genuine problem. What do you think?
|
||||||
NRA Life Member
US Air Force Veteran |
||||||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|||||
I dunno. I'm of the opinion that if you do enough searching, you'll find someone with bad comments to say about most anything. Personally, with regards to the "too dim" dot illumination in the second 4200 he received, in my opinion, that's ideal. If I can see the dot in low light, it's bright enough. I don't want much more illumination that "just bright enough to see clearly." I highly doubt that parallax problems are commonplace with this scope.
|
||||||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||||||
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |