Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
hunting binos |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | ||
SChunter
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/02/2007 Location: usa Status: Offline Points: 376 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: June/18/2008 at 20:11 |
|
Is there a listing of Binos done by the group here like the riflescopes (T-Bone) scale?
|
||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
No, a bino scale was never done.
|
||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||
lucytuma
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: November/25/2007 Location: Wisconsin Status: Offline Points: 5389 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
A bino scale would be helpful, but if you do a search you can find many useful ratings. If you have a price scale in mind, there are many knowledgable people here to help out, just ask.
|
||
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson
|
||
SChunter
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/02/2007 Location: usa Status: Offline Points: 376 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I have been a long time reader, but short time poster. I have noticed the large amounts of discussion of one bino vs another. But the thing that seems to be missing, to me, is the relative value of each when compared. I have found the TBone scale very useful. Just thought it would be nice to have a similar list in binos.
|
||
SChunter
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/02/2007 Location: usa Status: Offline Points: 376 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
for instance, many like the Nikon Monarch for the money, but rarely is there an o.t. comparison between the ATB, the Vortex Viper, and the Swaro EL. Not that those are the three that I would like to compare, but it serves the point. And again, it's not that I don't like birds, but the hunting bino has a few different hopes from distinquishing the type of feather on the wing of tweety! |
||
lucytuma
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: November/25/2007 Location: Wisconsin Status: Offline Points: 5389 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Personally, I believe the best values are in the $250-$500 range. The binos in this catagory should provide great service for 85% of all hunting situations. A used bino would also be a great option, many $600-$1000 binos are used only 2-3 weeks a year and can be found in mint condition for less then half price. Just take your time, ask alot of questions and handle and view as many can and make your descision from there. |
||
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson
|
||
SChunter
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/02/2007 Location: usa Status: Offline Points: 376 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I currently use a swfa 10x42 NIKON ATB set. What would you rank as the top 3 in the categories you described?
|
||
lucytuma
Optics Jedi Knight Joined: November/25/2007 Location: Wisconsin Status: Offline Points: 5389 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I think your nikon is probably one of the better values in this $350.00 range. If your looking to upgrade, I think your best to look at the vortex vipers @ $500.00 as a starting point. From there, there are many different options from Pentax, vortex, meopta, minox and so on. I am not and expert on binos, just trying to give you some food for thought until the other more noligable members chime in.
|
||
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson
|
||
SChunter
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/02/2007 Location: usa Status: Offline Points: 376 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
thanks--I have been looking at the vipers, meoptas, and was moving away from the kahles.
|
||
lucznik
Optics Master Joined: November/27/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1436 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
That's a little like asking a bunch of guys on a truck forum to rank the relative value of 4x4 pickups when compared. The Chevy lovers will tell you their picks and they'll be pretty adamant that they're right. The Dodge and Ford lovers however, will both vehemently disagree. And if you're crazy enough to let the guys (like me) who prefer those dang Japanese trucks to get a word in edge wise well,... Lord help you.
|
||
What if the hokey pokey really is what it's all about?
|
||
birdhunter
Optics Apprentice Joined: November/14/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 92 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
SC Hunter, if you give us your price range in the binoculars that your wanting I'm sure the guys on here can be a big help. I presonally had a pair of Nikon Monarch 8x42 and for the money they were fine binoculars, I also had a pair of Kahles 8x42 that I enjoyed as well and a friend of mine talked me into selling them to him. I had always wanted a pair of Swarovski SLCs and a guy in my area that deer hunts all over the US always used a pair of Swarovski 8x30 and 7x42s. He let me try out the 7x42 one day and I fell in love with the view and had to have a pair. I wished I would of bought them in the first place instead of going through a couple of pair to get what I wanted. I had to spend more money but these should last me for a long, long time. Not to mention that Swarovski has the best customer service in the business. My suggestion to you is try and go to bass pro shop, or a gun shop, sporting good store or anywhere that sells binoculars and try as many out as you can before you actually purchase a pair. My second choice at the time would of been the Meopta 7x42 or 8x42 they were also a excellent bino. I also like the Pentax binoculars for the money. There are alot of good binoculars out there and depending on your price range you should be able to find something you would enjoy. I'll tell you want an wise older fellow told me once that collected old double barrell shotguns. "Buy the best most expensive ones you can afford and never look back" Good luck in your search.
|
||
Birdhunter
|
||
Roy Finn
MODERATOR Steiner Junkie Joined: April/05/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4856 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
While I'm not a huge fan of this particular group, you might find this somewhat helpful. At the least, it gives you an idea of what was determined to be good according to price points. As far as comparing bino's from specific price points against each other, say $250 bino's against $1000+ bino's, I haven't seen something like that. I will say that today's bino's in the lower price groups are getting better and better and the large performance difference's that were once easy to see are becoming more difficult to separate. A good example of how good the mid-price group is compared to the alpha bino's from Leica, Zeiss and Swarovski, would be to compare a Minox HG ($700 or so) to one of the alpha bino's costing anywhere from $1500-$2000. There are considerations that are subjective between all bino's such as ergonomics which make comparisons difficult at any price point. Lastly, some bino's have a long track record for durability and function in extreme weather conditions that no short term "test" or casual review could possibly bring to light.
Roy
|
||
supertool73
Optics God Superstool Joined: January/03/2008 Status: Offline Points: 11814 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Just from researching and looking through bino's before I bought mine, I think it is pretty tough to beat the bino's in the $700 to $900 range. Are the ones that cost twice as much or more going to be better? Probably, but how much better. Are you willing to pay $1600 for a pair of bino's that may have 5% better glass? I know I wasn't, when I compared I went with the Meoptas because to my eyes I honestly could not see that the $1200 to $1600 bino's were any better. They may have been if I done some actual optical tests with them, but for just my viewing I just could not see it. So I ended up getting my Meopta 10x42s for the steal price of $700 even though I planned on $1500 for Swaro's. Unless you are one of the pickiest viewers out there and need near perfection in your glass, I think the $700 to $900 range is pretty tough to beat.
|
||
mike650
Optics God Joined: May/14/2006 Location: West of Rockies Status: Offline Points: 14569 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
|
||
SChunter
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/02/2007 Location: usa Status: Offline Points: 376 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Thanks--I have been seeing and hearing alot about the Razors. Roy, what do you have as a principal hunting bino?
|
||
Roy Finn
MODERATOR Steiner Junkie Joined: April/05/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4856 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Steiner Peregrine 8x42
|
||
SChunter
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/02/2007 Location: usa Status: Offline Points: 376 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
thanks for the quick reply!
|
||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I agree with supertool. As a class, the $700- $900 binos are tough to beat because they offer almost the image quality of the alpha class bins at half the price. I think the best deal available in this class is the Vortex Razor, followed closely by the Meopta Meostar. I own an 8X42 Razor, and spent a fair amount of time comparing it to the Meostar. The Razor and Meostar are pretty much equal optically, and opinions differ on which is "better." I would give the Razor the edge (no pun intended) simply because it is less expensive, lighter, has a better warranty, and I prefer the eyecups. I also prefer the way it feels, but those two are close enough in quality that if I preferred the feel of the Meostar, I would go with it without hesitation.
The Leica Ultravid, Zeiss Victory FL, and Swarovski EL are technically better, but not significantly so and certainly not proportional in price.
If you can give us a list of bins you are considering, we'll be happy to rank them as best we can. But, though you might get some consensus, I would expect each of our rankings would be different. When you get to the better $700 class bins and up, there are almost no bad choices and which one is better is a matter of opinion. Different people rank different optical, mechanical, and ergonomic qualities of bins in varying orders of importance. So, you see, there is no right and wrong answers and never will be as long as you're talking about bins in similar price and quality classes.
My binoculars, ranked in order from best to still quite good are: Leica 8X32 Ultravid HD, Vortex 8X42 Razor, Leica 8X50 Trinovid, and Kahles 10X42. Edited by RifleDude - June/20/2008 at 14:12 |
||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
||
SChunter
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/02/2007 Location: usa Status: Offline Points: 376 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
You're probably right. However, 1500-2000 bucks to get better glass could be a hard sell from the 5-800 market unless some of the more edge discussions or color hues come into play.
|
||
SChunter
Optics Journeyman Joined: December/02/2007 Location: usa Status: Offline Points: 376 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I have not narrowed the list entirely. However, the Razors are high on the list, as are the Meoptas. Earlier posts removed (I think) the Kahles from the short list. I am open to suggestions.
|
||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |