OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc. Homepage SWFA     SampleList.com
Forum Home Forum Home > Other Optics > Binoculars
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - SLC8x30 or ultravid 8x32
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials.

SLC8x30 or ultravid 8x32

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
pahuntnut View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: March/20/2008
Location: Pa Usa
Status: Offline
Points: 65
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote pahuntnut Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: SLC8x30 or ultravid 8x32
    Posted: March/22/2008 at 20:13
If you had to choose one for hunting and they were both the same price. Which woudl you choose?
Back to Top
Bird Watcher View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: August/30/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1523
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bird Watcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/22/2008 at 22:06
The main complaint about the Swaro 8x30mm SLC is that the focusing wheel is at the bottom of the center hinge rather than at the top, making it awkward to use.

You might take a look at the Swaro EL 8x32mm WB and compare the two.
Back to Top
mike650 View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: May/14/2006
Location: West of Rockies
Status: Offline
Points: 14569
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mike650 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/23/2008 at 01:11
Tough choice, both are great. I like Bird Watchers suggestion on the EL's. Thunbs%20Up
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.” – Fred Bear
Back to Top
pahuntnut View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: March/20/2008
Location: Pa Usa
Status: Offline
Points: 65
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote pahuntnut Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/23/2008 at 06:54
I never thought of that. but optically then if it weer between the EL's or ultravids.
Back to Top
Bird Watcher View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: August/30/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1523
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bird Watcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March/23/2008 at 15:51
Leica Ultravid 8x32 HD offers a 13.3mm Eye Relief not the greatest if you wear eyeglasses or sunglasses. FOV is 404'.

Swarovski EL 8x32mm offers a 15mm Eye Relief which is somewhat better. FOV is 420' which is slightly wider.

One would think that the new Leica HD should have the edge over the Swaro, as far as optics, BUT, you never can tell until you look through both, in a side-by-side comparison.



Edited by Bird Watcher - April/11/2008 at 15:00
Back to Top
Bartond View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: July/22/2005
Location: Denver
Status: Offline
Points: 15
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bartond Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/11/2008 at 13:53
You should look through both binoculars before considering eye relief by the stated numbers. Different companies measure eye relief from different points and I believe Leica's stated "effective eye relief" will always be stated shorter than others though it it probably is very comparable.

Leica seemed to really increase depth of field with their new Ultravid HD and it is crazy bright and sharp. Gives very natural color rendition, too. The 8x32 HD is so small and lightweight, which might be the best feature of all.

Both are great so you should look through both and consider all of the features before making a decision.
Get outside...
Back to Top
Bird Watcher View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: August/30/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1523
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bird Watcher Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/11/2008 at 15:33
Originally posted by Bartond Bartond wrote:

You should look through both binoculars before considering eye relief by the stated numbers.


Good advise. Manufacturer's specifications are not always 100% accurate.
Back to Top
etc View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: January/01/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote etc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/12/2008 at 22:55
Why do you want a compact?

A full size 8x42 is much easier to use.


Back to Top
birdhunter View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: November/14/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 92
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote birdhunter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/14/2008 at 07:51
I would pick the Swarovski in either ELs or SLCs myself simply for thier warrenty and their outstanding customer service.  They really do stand behind each product they sell.  Both Swarovski and Leica are top of the line but the Swarovskis just fit my eyes and hands better.  You really need to try each of the two brands out to your eyes and handling.  bird_hunter66
Birdhunter
Back to Top
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
EVIL OPPRESSOR

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 16337
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote RifleDude Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April/14/2008 at 16:25
Originally posted by etc etc wrote:

Why do you want a compact?

A full size 8x42 is much easier to use.


 
Technically, the 32mm objective binos are considered "mid size."  I personally find a high quality 8X32 to be a very appealing configuration.  The high-end 8X32's with good ED/FL glass and the latest dielectric prism coatings and broadband multicoatings are only slightly behind the 8X42's in low light performance, actually outperforming some lower quality 8X42's.  In addition, the 32mm objective binoculars almost always have wider FOV than their 42mm siblings.  All the reviews I've read of the high-end 8X32's such as the SLC and Ultravid (as well as Zeiss FL) the OP is considering have unanimously stated that they provide resolution, contrast, and edge to edge sharpness very close or equal to their 42mm counterparts.  The smaller objective 32's may have slightly more pronounced aberrations, especially closer to the edges of the field, but the tradeoff is a much more compact, handier bino that can be very user-friendly and convenient when you're carrying them around your neck for long periods of time.  I haven't found the really good 32mm bins to be any less critical on eye relief or viewing ease.  The only significant sacrifices I see with the smaller 32mm binoculars vs. the full-size 42mm models is a slight loss of low light performance that may only translate to a few minutes in the early morning / late evening, and they may be harder for some to steady in the hands due to the smaller physical size and lighter weight.  Overall, I think sacrificing a little bit of light transmission in some cases is a worthwhile tradeoff for lighter weight, more compact size, and wider FOV.


Edited by RifleDude - April/14/2008 at 17:39
Ted


Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.223 seconds.