New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Elite 4200 vs. Nikon Monarch
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Elite 4200 vs. Nikon Monarch

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/06/2010 at 11:04
Grand poo bah View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: July/22/2009
Location: Eugene, OR
Status: Offline
Points: 22
Hey all,

I'm looking at the Elite 4200 6-24-50 side focus Mil Dot and the Nikon Monarch 6-24x50 BDC.  Can ne 1 give some incite on the glass quality, opinions about the Mil Dot vs. the BDC, and any other advice on these would be great.  I'm using this on a Next Generation Arms AR-15 .223 flat top.  The Bushnell has a 30mm tube but the Nikon claims better light transition.  This is so confusing!! 
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/06/2010 at 11:15
SVT_Tactical View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
Chief Sackscratch

Joined: December/17/2009
Location: NorthCackalacky
Status: Offline
Points: 28753

Bushnell has the Mil-Dot which I am a huge fan of and has the side focus which i like as well.  I am not big on the BDC reticle and the light transition will be so simalar i think you wouldn't be able to tell a difference.

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/06/2010 at 13:27
Teddy Bear View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: December/22/2009
Location: Ontario, Can
Status: Offline
Points: 80
I went through this dilemma b4 xmas.  Bought the same monarch you are looking at for my Browning 223WSSM, hasn't been delivered yet though.  Both scopes have side focus but I think the nikon has slightly better eye relief not that it should be an issue with a 223.  Mine will be used for hunting purposes so I liked that the monarch had different turrets that came with it.  Not sure if the elite does, never had one.  Both probably good scopes, in the end went with the monarch because I have issues with a cheaper bushnell on another rifle but thats my opinion.  You might also want to check out the Vortex Viper 6.5-20x50 as well.  Also the elite had 1/4 MOA where the monarch is 1/8 MOA but that will have to wait to be tested if true.  Hope this helps, can hardly wait till mine arrives.
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Elite 4200 vs. Nikon Monarch"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Elite 4200 vs.Nikon Monarch DAVE44 Rifle Scopes 29 12/1/2004 3:41:32 AM
Nikon Monarch Gold VS Bushnell Elite 4200 cjhauser Rifle Scopes 12 2/9/2007 1:16:58 PM
Bushnell 4200 vs Nikon Monarch - REVISED Hogwild Rifle Scopes 3 8/17/2005 9:53:43 PM
Monarch or Elite 4200 shoot4fun Rifle Scopes 11 4/13/2007 12:57:36 AM
Elite 4200 vs Monarch koshkin Member's Tests and Reviews 11 4/25/2007 2:42:36 PM
Sightron SII VS Monarch VS Elite 4200 horsesandhorns Rifle Scopes 14 10/16/2007 6:47:44 AM
Elite 4200 vs. Monarch mike53 Rifle Scopes 142 11/19/2007 1:57:00 PM
Elite 4200 30mm OR Burris OR Nikon newscope Rifle Scopes 3 7/19/2006 6:17:33 AM
Nikon Monarch vs Monarch Gold vs Titanium royy2 Rifle Scopes 1 9/21/2006 2:26:34 AM
4200 Elite vs 3200 Elite fusionstar916 Rifle Scopes 3 9/14/2006 10:16:49 PM


This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.