New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Elite 4200 or Nikon Monarch?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Elite 4200 or Nikon Monarch?

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options Page  1 2 3>
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/31/2006 at 14:57
klt1986 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: December/31/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Need some scope recomendations for a .25-06.  Will mainly be used for deer hunting and some light coyote/varmint hunting.  Really like the looks of the Elite 4200 3x9x40 and the Monarch in the same configuration.  Anyone have any experience with the Nikon "BDC" reticle?  Any other ideads will be appreciated.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/31/2006 at 14:59
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20475
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/31/2006 at 16:10
pyro6999 View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
OT TITAN

Joined: December/22/2006
Location: North Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 22024
you cant go wrong either way, both are excellent scopes and i doubt that anyone would talk you out of either
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/01/2007 at 08:21
tahqua View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Have You Driven A Ford Lately?

Joined: March/27/2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8047
How about the Leupold with the Boone and Crockett reticle? The Leupolds tend to cost more than the Bushnell and Nikon but this system allows for windage, also. I haven't used either one and have always used standard or heavy plex types and they have worked for me. Some of the other posters that have tried both will hopefully share some information with us.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/01/2007 at 16:08
Trinidad View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: May/04/2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1555
The 4200 is a very good scope. Stay away from Leupold=poor quality glass and extremly overpriced. Leupold scopes are priced higher all across thier lines than many much higher performing scopes. I recommend a search through the OT search engine.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/01/2007 at 19:21
pyro6999 View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
OT TITAN

Joined: December/22/2006
Location: North Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 22024

Originally posted by SVD666 SVD666 wrote:

The 4200 is a very good scope. Stay away from Leupold=poor quality glass and extremly overpriced. Leupold scopes are priced higher all across thier lines than many much higher performing scopes. I recommend a search through the OT search engine.

 

i agree 100%

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/01/2007 at 19:53
Acenturian View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: September/07/2004
Status: Offline
Points: 543

Ok, now I have to disagree here. I would not say that Leupold has "poor quality glass", I think they are over priced for what you get.  Classic examples on both sides of the spectrum is the Leupold Rifleman a perfectly fine scope but for the price I don't think it is in the same class as say a Nikon Buckmaster or a Burris Fullfield / Pentax.

 

Take the new VXIII series very nice glass but for the price I would rather have a Conquest which is usually a bit cheaper or spend a bit more and get a Kahles both of which I think are better scopes.

 

This is just my opinon, but I think that Leupold really needs to think about lowering their prices. On the other hand why should they? So many people out there still believe that it is the only scope out there and therefore people will pay the inflated prices.  However, like I said above I don't think they are a bad scope and anyone using one is still using a great scope, just not so great for the price.

 

On that note, I'd go with the Bushnell 4200 Elite over the Monarch. I think both are very good scopes but my preference is to the 4200



Edited by Acenturian
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/01/2007 at 20:10
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 10972
I am with Acenturian on this one, for the most part.

Leupold VX-II, VX-III and above have perfectly serviceable glass.  They are just overpriced for wat they offer.

Now, Rifleman, VX-I and Euro-30 certainly fall into "poor glass" category from what I've seen.

ILya


Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 08:37
jonbravado View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: October/05/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1131

go elite 4200 and don't look back - it's a wonderful scope for the money.

 

 

J

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 15:26
Tip69 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar
Tip Stick

Joined: September/27/2005
Location: Nebraska
Status: Offline
Points: 3483

I'd vote for the Conquest for a .25-06.  The 3-9X40 is a great buy at $399.99.  I think the eye-relief on the Nikon is a little better than the 4200, so it would be my second choice or a Burris Signature Select.  If you were putting this scope on a .243 or smaller, then the 4200 would be my first choice.

 

 

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 15:31
Roy Finn View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Steiner Junkie

Joined: April/05/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4856
Originally posted by Tip69 Tip69 wrote:

  If you were putting this scope on a .243 or smaller, then the 4200 would be my first choice.

 

 

 

I have one of these scopes on my 300 WM, and eye relief is not a problem.

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 15:36
Trinidad View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: May/04/2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1555
Originally posted by Roy Finn Roy Finn wrote:

Originally posted by Tip69 Tip69 wrote:

  If you were putting this scope on a .243 or smaller, then the 4200 would be my first choice.

 

 

 

I have one of these scopes on my 300 WM, and eye relief is not a problem.

 

+1, I have never found a problem with the eye relief in any 4200. I have shot serveral and 4200's are a great buy within thier price range IMO.

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 15:42
Roy Finn View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Steiner Junkie

Joined: April/05/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4856
The only scope brighter than a 4200 is possibly, maybe, couldbe a S&B.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 15:45
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20475

Originally posted by Roy Finn Roy Finn wrote:

The only scope brighter than a 4200 is possibly, maybe, couldbe a S&B.

 

Oh Brother.......

 

Do you have any "scentific testing" to back that statement up, Sir??

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 15:47
Trinidad View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: May/04/2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1555
Originally posted by cheaptrick cheaptrick wrote:

Originally posted by Roy Finn Roy Finn wrote:

The only scope brighter than a 4200 is possibly, maybe, couldbe a S&B.

 

Oh Brother.......

 

Do you have any "scentific testing" to back that statement up, Sir??

     

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 15:50
Roy Finn View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Steiner Junkie

Joined: April/05/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4856

Yeah, bend over and I'll give you all the scentific testing you want........

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 15:53
tahqua View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Have You Driven A Ford Lately?

Joined: March/27/2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8047
They do use some kind of scope for that test, you know
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 15:53
Trinidad View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: May/04/2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1555
 
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 15:55
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20475
Originally posted by Roy Finn Roy Finn wrote:

Yeah, bend over and I'll give you all the scentific testing you want........

 

I'll take your word for it!!

Thanks all the same........

 

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 15:56
Roy Finn View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Steiner Junkie

Joined: April/05/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4856
Yeah, those target turrets can be painful with that test.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 15:57
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 10972
Roy, I thought you were listening.



Brightness per se is not especially important.  Just about any decent scope is bright enough in scientific terms, i.e. transmits a lot of light.

Now, perceived brightness depends heavily on the resolution of the image, and as much as I like Elite 4200, I can assure you that there are quite a few scopes nestling comfortably between Elite 4200 and S&B in terms of resolution.

I see my previous admonitions have not been heeded so I will quietly retreat back to the abyss and do some more low light tests.



ILya


Edited by koshkin
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 15:59
tahqua View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Have You Driven A Ford Lately?

Joined: March/27/2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8047
Well, if I had to I would prefer a 20mm objective
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 16:03
Roy Finn View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Steiner Junkie

Joined: April/05/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4856
Make sure your benchmark is a Leupold, properly focused naturally, because John Barsness says....... blah, blah, blah........eyebox..... blah, blah, blah...... customer serice.......blah, blah, blah....... Outdoor Life says.......... DEVA........

Edited by Roy Finn
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 16:19
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 10972
Yes I'll send the scopes first to E for focusing.  Than to DEVA for some more useless testing.  Won't say anything about Barseness. I like the guy and feel bad that E is always misquoting him.  I'll pay special attention to measuring various mythical qualities of scopes too.

ILya
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2007 at 16:33
Roy Finn View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Steiner Junkie

Joined: April/05/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4856
ILya, don't forget, disregard all instructions in owners manuals regarding reticle focusing, especially on partially cloudy semi-moon lit nights.
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  1 2 3>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Elite 4200 or Nikon Monarch?"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Elite 4200 vs.Nikon Monarch DAVE44 Rifle Scopes 29 12/1/2004 3:41:32 AM
Nikon Monarch Gold VS Bushnell Elite 4200 cjhauser Rifle Scopes 12 2/9/2007 1:16:58 PM
Bushnell 4200 vs Nikon Monarch - REVISED Hogwild Rifle Scopes 3 8/17/2005 9:53:43 PM
Monarch or Elite 4200 shoot4fun Rifle Scopes 11 4/13/2007 12:57:36 AM
Elite 4200 vs Monarch koshkin Member's Tests and Reviews 11 4/25/2007 2:42:36 PM
Sightron SII VS Monarch VS Elite 4200 horsesandhorns Rifle Scopes 14 10/16/2007 6:47:44 AM
Elite 4200 vs. Monarch mike53 Rifle Scopes 142 11/19/2007 1:57:00 PM
Elite 4200 30mm OR Burris OR Nikon newscope Rifle Scopes 3 7/19/2006 6:17:33 AM
Nikon Monarch vs Monarch Gold vs Titanium royy2 Rifle Scopes 1 9/21/2006 2:26:34 AM
4200 Elite vs 3200 Elite fusionstar916 Rifle Scopes 3 9/14/2006 10:16:49 PM


This page was generated in 0.719 seconds.