Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Cheap Scopes |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |
Graysteel
Optics Apprentice Joined: October/02/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 200 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: October/25/2007 at 16:51 |
I have to wonder if we aren't a bit too hard on inexpensive scopes and optics.
I know that the under $100 aren't up to the same specs as the $1000 scopes, but are they really worse than not having a scope at all? I used to have an old Bushnell, I think I paid $29 for it. It was a 4x32 and I used it on a paintball gun for years. I played at the semi-pro level, so this wasn't a scope that only got used once a month. It lasted for years and served me very well. That scope was banged, battered, kicked and dropped and always worked just fine. Countless times I used it as a makeshift telescope to see what 'that bump by the log' really was. I can't say it would stand up to recoil, but it held up to paintballs and beatings just fine. I also had couple scopes of same cost that lived on pellet guns during my youth. I wore out several break-barrel crossmans with a little $15 Tasco. Heck, those pellet rifles put quite a few rabbits on the table. For years my grandfather used a pair of 'Sears' (swift I made them I believe) binoculars to read the markings off of ships that came by his place at the beach, they always worked fine. One of my favorite pair of binoculars is an under $200 pair of Olympus armored 7x50s. In the evening, they are more clear than any military Leupold scope ever was. (Of, course they have the advantage of lower power and larger objective, but you get my point) I not not saying I would rather have a Tasco than a S&B. And in my short time here, I have done my share of bashing cheaper tacticals for for poor knobs. But, I wonder if we aren't falling into just a wee bit of elitism is all. |
|
cheaptrick
MODERATOR Joined: September/27/2004 Location: South Carolina Status: Offline Points: 20844 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Tagged.
|
|
tahqua
MODERATOR Have You Driven A Ford Lately? Joined: March/27/2006 Location: Michigan, USA Status: Offline Points: 9044 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Most of the optics I own are mid-range. Burris, Leo, B&L, Bushnell and Nikon. I also have Zeiss, Kahles and recently some Steiner optics.
I am not sure where you are going with this question. Do you think we are being hard on people asking questions or the optics themselves? If it is the people asking the questions I think most of the opinions/advice given around here is pretty good. Most questions about low end optics are followed with "what is your budget". On plinkers most can get by with much less glass, yet we strive to steer them towards a decent glass in their price range. If it is about the glass itself then I see no elitism around here. I see praise for glass in all price ranges with the better mid-range glass receiving the most. Naturally the high end Euro glass gets high praise and for good reason, it is generally excellent. I will never say anything positive about cheap Chinese glass that sucks, because it does. That being said, my beater binoculars are made by Swift in Macau, of all places. They weren't very expensive and work. Doug |
|
pyro6999
Optics Retard OT TITAN Joined: December/22/2006 Location: North Dakota Status: Offline Points: 22034 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
i dont have any scopes worth more than $250, cause for one i cannot afford more, now that i have been around this place i am willing to wait longer to buy a new scope and save extra money to get a better quality scope, cause in most cases the old saying "you get what you pay for" with optics is generally true to life.
|
|
They call me "Boots"
375H&H Mag: Yeah, it kills stuff "extra dead" 343 we will never forget God Bless Chris Ledoux "good ride cowboy" |
|
Acenturian
Optics Journeyman Joined: September/07/2004 Status: Offline Points: 543 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
no, I don't think "we" as forum members are being unfair or hard on cheap optics. First, its an optics sight and people are seeking advice with various optical products so someone who only wants "junk" I doubt will be on this forum they would just go down buy the $49.99 special and call it good.
The other thing is "Cheap" is not always that cheap. Meaning that if a scope cost $100.00 which in a retail store with mark up would be a pretty low end scope, the advice many people here give (myself included) is save for a bit more. The first step in optics is the biggest of all. People will see a huge difference in low end stuff and entry level good scopes and binoculars so in the end the "cheap" scope / binocular is really not all that cheap, its actually a waste of money.
Just my 2 cents
happy shooting AC |
|
If You're In A Fair Fight, You Didn't Plan It Properly
- Anonymous |
|
falfreak
Optics GrassHopper Joined: April/02/2007 Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have a $25 BSA 4x scope on my .22 and on my mosin nagant 91/30 and I could not be happier with the clarity and performance. To be honest I think it was underpriced. I did have a Bushnell Trophy on the nagant and I HATED it (eye releif was waaaaay too touchy).
I put a centerpoint tactical on my FAL and the jury is still out on that one (plus I have not shot it much) so we will see how that cheapy goes. There are GOOD scopes for cheap out there but it can really vary from model to model within a brand. So far though unless I am going to buy a SS, leupy, or IOR etc I am going with BSA on the cheap side. |
|
cyborg
Optics God Gaseous Clay Joined: August/24/2007 Location: North Georgia Status: Offline Points: 12288 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
HMMM, I'm gonna say it this way, I won't settle for cheap stuff, If it's a bargain as in a Savage rifle, a SuperSniper, the new Milletts, I'm all for it, That's inexpensive, not cheap. I'm not gonna name the cheap stuff. All of this being said, if I am going to spend the money on a hunting trip, to get my chance at a trophy, or food on the table, the last thing I want is to have a cheap scope, cheap ammo, etc. I have more respect for my quarry than to risk a piss poor shot due to skimping on equipment. There are way too many other things that can happen I sure as hell don't want to risk it. This doesn't even touch on the necessity aspect of individual freedom and responsibility. We are tasked with the freedom of this Country, Hence the 2nd amendment, DO YOU WANT CHEAP IN THAT SCENARIO ???? I sure don't, and I don't want the man next to me who puts his life in my hands, as i put mine in his to be using inferior cheap crap. There are inexpensive good quality scopes that likely will hold up for harsher use than their intended design, Bushnell comes to mind, some older tascos, etc. I'm getting off the soap box now.
|
|
With Freedom comes great responsibility, you cannot have one without the other
An armed public are citizens. A disarmed public are subjects. OATH KEEPER #8233 Support us, and join our cause. Cyborg |
|
martin3175
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: January/19/2005 Location: Maryland Status: Offline Points: 3773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Cheap doesn't always mean it's a good value...And a good value isn't always cheap... the magic is to find the right balance for what one's budget can allow. Whether you're in the market for a $100 or a $1000 optic, it's always a good idea to verify where your money would be best spent. |
|
Graysteel
Optics Apprentice Joined: October/02/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 200 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Again, I completely agree the high end scopes are much better. But, as I said I have made good use and gotten very workable results from quite a few under $100 range. The point had been made that it is not just about 'cheap' but good value for the dollar. What brands do you folks think are decent value for a dollar on the low end?
Chris carries BSA. I haven't used them, but I would be curious to know what people think. As I mentioned I have had really good luck with the low end Bushnells. Certainly, they aren't (insert favorite brand) but plenty of folks have used them for years to bring home game. So, I guess Bushnell would get my vote for decent low end scope. Other thoughts? |
|
cyborg
Optics God Gaseous Clay Joined: August/24/2007 Location: North Georgia Status: Offline Points: 12288 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have a friend with an older BSA, not bad just not good either, it has not fallen apart yet, so I guess that's something, but he can't hunt as long as those of us with Bushy's. even the cheaper bushys, I own a banner, but it's been a dang goodun. it's as clear as a 3200, but it's also an older model don't know about the newer model. I won't spend a dime on a simmons>>>>>period, My youngest brother owns some pre meade tascos that are pretty good.
|
|
With Freedom comes great responsibility, you cannot have one without the other
An armed public are citizens. A disarmed public are subjects. OATH KEEPER #8233 Support us, and join our cause. Cyborg |
|
pyro6999
Optics Retard OT TITAN Joined: December/22/2006 Location: North Dakota Status: Offline Points: 22034 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
im not impressed with bsa's variable high power scopes they get cloudy fast.
|
|
They call me "Boots"
375H&H Mag: Yeah, it kills stuff "extra dead" 343 we will never forget God Bless Chris Ledoux "good ride cowboy" |
|
Acenturian
Optics Journeyman Joined: September/07/2004 Status: Offline Points: 543 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Ok...something to keep in mind is what it's for and what conditions. Ok, short story but a lessoned learned. I've had a couple different pairs of binoculars over the years my first OK good (not $39.99 junk) was a pair of Carson XM (never should have sold = great buy) then a pair of Weaver Grandslam 10.4x45 ($500.00) pretty good nocs in the sceme of things. Compared them to a friends Leica on a wonderful blue bird clear sunny day and I couldnt see hardly any difference. Ok, now fast forward hunting in miserable conditions lots of snow, mixed with rain (bad weather) the sun breaks and with the snow I get tons and tons of C A from my $500 pair of Weavers the Leica ..not a dam thing.
So moral of the story you can't always go to a store or out on a perfect day and go well that Simmons looks about as good as that Zeiss. There is a reason for all the high prices top end stuff commands. BUT not everyone needs that but I will say it again entry good level optics still provide a the best bank for you buck. Going cheap (unless its so cheap that its lunch money) is a waste of money since some of these "cheaper scopes/binoculars" are not all that far behind good products in price. Save a little bit more money and get a product that will serve you well. |
|
If You're In A Fair Fight, You Didn't Plan It Properly
- Anonymous |
|
Big Squeeze
Optics Master Extraordinaire GOOGLE NINJA Joined: August/30/2007 Location: Anaheim, Calif. Status: Offline Points: 3143 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
For those of you who have had good luck with your BSA`s and Barska`s! Your luck can always change,,real fast!!! You get what you pay for! Some look at a scope as an expense! I prefer to call it an investment. An investment in my hunting and shooting enjoyment that will last a lifetime and perform flawlessly under ANY weather condition!...........BSA`s? Barskas?
|
|
Big Squeeze
Optics Master Extraordinaire GOOGLE NINJA Joined: August/30/2007 Location: Anaheim, Calif. Status: Offline Points: 3143 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Tasco`s too!
|
|
RONK
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: April/05/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3199 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
For me, it always seems to come down to low-light performance, at least from the standpoint of a deer and elk hunter. Scopes all look great in the showroom, but at twilight you can always separate the good, the bad and the ugly. It usually breaks down quite predictably along purchase price lines, too, with a few exceptions. If you don't need low light performance, an el cheapo may work fine for your needs-at least for a while. I am a blue- collar slob with a family. My hunting opportunities are few and far between, and I consider them precious. Most precious of all are the last 20 minutes of shooting light when I've been in a treestand since a half an hour before sunup on a cold gray November day. Then is when I kill my biggest bucks. Then is when I'm REALLY glad I stretched my tight budget a little more than maybe I should have. |
|
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The most durable scope for ~$100 that I have is a Sightron S1 3-9x40.
Some other inexpensive (~$100 and under) scopes that I have had good luck with are: Bushnell Trophy 3-9x40 (also rated for an airgun) Pentax Gameseeker 6x40 and 1.75-5x20 I have had uniformly aweful luck with BSA, Leapersm, NcStar, and a few other chicom scopes. Generally, I would recommend to spend at least ~$200 on a scope. That gets you some pretty nice products, but if you have to get a cheaper piece, there are OK options out there. ILya |
|
RONK
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: April/05/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3199 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Koshkin- how would you rate the low-light performance of the Sightron S1 3-9x40 you mentioned, as compared to some of the more commonly-encountered brands of similar magnification?
|
|
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
ANy specific scopes you are comparing it too?
If you are concerned about low light performance you should really be looking at more expensive scopes. In this price range if it is reasonably clear and holds zero, you are already a step ahead of the competition. ILya |
|
RONK
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: April/05/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3199 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Oh, let's say a Vari-X II in a 3-9 x 40 just for comparison's sake. I'm just curious, never having used or even seen a Sightron , but hearing some pretty good things about them. I realize the S-1 is not in the high-rent district, of course. Edited by RONK |
|
koshkin
MODERATOR Dark Lord of Optics Joined: June/15/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 13182 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
If you want to use Leupold for comparison, I think Sightron S1 is somewhat similar in terms of optics to Leupold VX-1. Maybe a touch better, but not as good as VX-II. Not sure how it compares to the older Vari-X II, but I think Vari-X II is more or less the same as the current VX-1.
Mechanically, Sightron S1 is pretty sturdy. It is my "beater" scope. I have used it on a number of different rifles as a "place holder" until I could put something more expensive on, and it always held zero and adjustments were repeatable. ILya |
|
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |