New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - B&L Balvar vs. Japanese Pre-Monarch Nikon
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

B&L Balvar vs. Japanese Pre-Monarch Nikon

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/03/2010 at 13:31
cj17 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice

Joined: April/19/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 81

I am considering purchasing either a B&L Balvar 2.5-10x40 or Nikon 3-9x40 scope to complete a dream project of mine that I couldn't afford when these scopes were new on the market.  Both of these scopes are from the time frame when they were made in Japan and prior to Nikon naming the Monarch line and B&L evolving into the  Bushnell Elite line.

The Balvar's tend to cost more than the Nikon's if in similar condition.  I was just wondering if anyone had any input as to the quality of these two scopes relative to the other.  I know that there are better scopes available now but like I said these are the two I coveted for this rifle (a .243) back when I was a poor teenager and this is more about getting what I want then getting the best available for my $
Thanks for your input.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/04/2010 at 07:34
magshooter1 View Drop Down
Optics Professional
Optics Professional

Joined: August/27/2008
Location: El Dorado, AR
Status: Offline
Points: 773
Don't know much about the B&L Balvar but, I still have a "Pre" Monarch Nikon (3x9x40) and have no problems with it.  It's sitting on top of my daughter's Model 70 Featherweight 6mm Rem.  Dang good scope too.  I had another "Pre" in 4x12x40 AO that I had to send in because it had some kind of film on the inside of the objective lens.  Wasn't noticable when looking thru the scope just when looking at the objective.  Less than 10 days later I had a brand new Monarch 4x12x40 AO.  So I guess I'm partial to the Nikons.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/04/2010 at 16:14
smithrjd View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice

Joined: September/27/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 86
I had a Balvar in 2.5X10X40 on my Sako AV. In its day it was a high end scope. I paid $280 for it in 1984. Used it for 25 years and never had any problems. Glass was good, better than many scopes in its day. I have never had the early Nikons, but do have a Monarch UCC the B&L was at least as good. Not up to a Zeiss or Kahles, but better than Leupold Redfield of its era. The Balvar became the Elite, then became Bushnell Elite then 4200 series.  HTH 
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "B&L Balvar vs. Japanese Pre-Monarch Nikon"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Nikon Monarch vs Monarch Gold vs Titanium royy2 Rifle Scopes 1 9/21/2006 2:26:34 AM
B & L Balvar adjustable mount sfk1229 Rings and bases 0 11/14/2006 7:06:28 AM
Bausch & Lomb Balvar pdrvt Rifle Scopes 1 1/25/2007 11:01:37 PM
Old Japanese spotting scope & tripod edm812 Spotting Scopes 8 11/20/2007 9:33:15 AM
Bausch & Lomb BALVAR PA BEN Rifle Scopes 2
pre 64 M70 300 h&h mounts handwerk Rings and bases 0
B&L Balvar 24 indianamoon Target 3
B & L Balvar 8A ptrumble1 Rifle Scopes 3
Nikon Monarch Larryand Rifle Scopes 1 10/26/2007 3:40:42 AM
3-9x40 Nikon Monarch tahqua Member's Tests and Reviews 4 11/12/2007 10:49:30 PM

This page was generated in 0.359 seconds.