New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Best strategy, size vs clarity ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

Best strategy, size vs clarity ?

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/19/2008 at 20:50
JDH View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: December/19/2008
Location: SC
Status: Offline
Points: 7
Hello everyone, so low light shooting is the number one factor and I am wondering whether I would be better off with a Bushnell 4200 or Monarch in a 50mm or go with a better glass like the Zeiss 3-4x 40 conquest or scratch and dent Kahles 3-9x42 American Hunter I saw on the sample list.  I am absolutely maxed out at $450.   Thanks for your help, this forum has already been extremely useful.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/19/2008 at 20:56
rifle looney View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: November/21/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 2553
Go for the clarity=kahles or zeiss is my vote.Cool
All the scopes on your list are good choices.


Edited by rifle looney - December/19/2008 at 21:12
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/19/2008 at 23:58
JDH View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: December/19/2008
Location: SC
Status: Offline
Points: 7
So to be more clear, will I get more night shooting out of the Bushnell with the 50mm lens or the Zeiss which is said to have better glass but is only 40mm?  If it is a wash i will go with the cheaper Bushnell.  Any other factors I am not thinking of? 
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/20/2008 at 02:41
huff143 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: December/08/2008
Location: Kansas City
Status: Offline
Points: 299
JDH,
 
I had BOTH of these scopes (the Zeiss and Monarch) in my hands TODAY.  I walked outside the gun shop with both of them at about 4:50pm CST and the Zeiss had better clarity without a doubt.  You should go check them side-by-side, but I did it and the Zeiss won.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/20/2008 at 08:41
silver View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master


Joined: November/04/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2291
There is a certain "vodoo" that goes into contruction.  In english that means the reduction of stray light bouncing inside the scope, creating the equal of background noise in sound. That and better coatings and alignment is where the extra money goes.  I lean towards the Zeiss.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/20/2008 at 08:53
cbm View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: January/11/2008
Location: SC
Status: Offline
Points: 474
I'd go with the Conquest and I have a Monarch .
 
I'll shoot you a PM .
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/20/2008 at 09:44
mike650 View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: May/14/2006
Location: West of Rockies
Status: Offline
Points: 12712
Originally posted by JDH JDH wrote:

Hello everyone, so low light shooting is the number one factor and I am wondering whether I would be better off with a Bushnell 4200 or Monarch in a 50mm or go with a better glass like the Zeiss 3-4x 40 conquest or scratch and dent Kahles 3-9x42 American Hunter I saw on the sample list.  I am absolutely maxed out at $450.   Thanks for your help, this forum has already been extremely useful.


Was that a typo and did you mean 3-9x40?

If it's, go for the Zeiss.
 
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/20/2008 at 12:37
trigger29 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar
X = 180 Y = 90 (X+Pyro)+(Y-Pyro) = ?

Joined: September/29/2007
Location: South Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 4295
+1. Another vote for the Zeiss.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/20/2008 at 12:39
pyro6999 View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
OT TITAN

Joined: December/22/2006
Location: North Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 22024
the new monarch in a 50mm wouldnt be a bad choice
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/20/2008 at 13:34
SamC View Drop Down
Optics Professional
Optics Professional
Avatar

Joined: October/01/2007
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 900

I like the Conquest line, they are a very good value for the quality you get.

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/20/2008 at 14:21
Kickboxer View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: February/13/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 18344
Between your choices, I would go with the Zeiss.  I am re-scoping a "traditional" hunting rifle soon and have ALMOST, nearly, probably decided on Zeiss for it.  But might go with Swarovski...

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/20/2008 at 14:31
Rancid Coolaid View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Master
Optics Jedi Master
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7702
Originally posted by Kickboxer Kickboxer wrote:

Between your choices, I would go with the Zeiss.  I am re-scoping a "traditional" hunting rifle soon and have ALMOST, nearly, probably decided on Zeiss for it.  But might go with Swarovski...




I might have a Zeiss for sale, moving to Swaro, ( if Santa does her job.)


Between the 2, money permitting, Swaro is the way to go.  if you can't drop the $$, Conquest is a fine scope.

FYI: of the several things I have bought fro the sample list, I have been very, very pleased with the result.  If you can save a few hundred dollars by getting from the Sample List, it is money well spent. Kahles on the Sample List might be worthy of considration.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/20/2008 at 14:34
Kickboxer View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: February/13/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 18344
Thanks, RC.  I have been watching the sample list closely.  I also recently learned to not delay too long, cause if you want it, it might be GONE pretty quickly.  (like in a matter of minutes).
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/20/2008 at 14:34
mike650 View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: May/14/2006
Location: West of Rockies
Status: Offline
Points: 12712
Originally posted by Rancid Coolaid Rancid Coolaid wrote:

Originally posted by Kickboxer Kickboxer wrote:

Between your choices, I would go with the Zeiss.  I am re-scoping a "traditional" hunting rifle soon and have ALMOST, nearly, probably decided on Zeiss for it.  But might go with Swarovski...




I might have a Zeiss for sale, moving to Swaro, ( if Santa does her job.)


Between the 2, money permitting, Swaro is the way to go.  if you can't drop the $$, Conquest is a fine scope.

FYI: of the several things I have bought fro the sample list, I have been very, very pleased with the result.  If you can save a few hundred dollars by getting from the Sample List, it is money well spent. Kahles on the Sample List might be worthy of considration.


Thunbs Up
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/20/2008 at 15:08
SamC View Drop Down
Optics Professional
Optics Professional
Avatar

Joined: October/01/2007
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 900
I have both a Conquest and Swaro PH and I've got to admit the Swaro is brighter but for the much higher price tag of the Swaro the Conquest is a much better value for your buck IMHO This Much
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: December/21/2008 at 13:40
jonoMT View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar

Joined: November/13/2008
Location: Montana
Status: Offline
Points: 4616
Good glass seems more important and a smaller objective is always a plus if you can get away with it. Exit pupil on a 3-9X40 @ 9X is 4.44. That's really not bad.
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "Best strategy, size vs clarity ?"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Body sizing only?.....Neck sizing? sniper13 Reloading & Ballistics 115
Glass Clarity Listing [Please Participate] space_weazel Rifle Scopes 76
SWFA SS16X42 Optical clarity .308WIN Tactical Scopes 5
SWFA 16X42 OPtical clarity .308WIN Rifle Scopes 2
Votex 6-24 pst good bad ugly porkchop401 Tactical Scopes 5
How to test scopes for clarity... tjtjwdad Rifle Scopes 11
Does nitrogen-filled improve clarity? tpcollins Binoculars 2
20X SS clarity Tulie Rifle Scopes 7
Clarity fog eliminator? doctor duck Rifle Scopes 6
Surprised at clarity of 1985 Swift scope! spystyle Rifle Scopes 4 4/21/2007 7:03:36 AM


This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.