Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials. |
Best Rifle Scope |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |||||||||||||||
cfusco
Optics GrassHopper Joined: July/07/2009 Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: July/07/2009 at 15:37 |
||||||||||||||
In your opinion - if money were no object - what is the best rifle scope made?
I need a new scope for a new custom rifle in 338/378 Wby and plan on using it for everything from long range elk hunting to moose, brown and grizzly bear hunting.
I'm leaning towards a Swaro Z6, or Profesional Hunter, a Zeiss Diavari, or a Schmidt & Bender - all in the 3-10 or 4-12 range.
But there's so many good choices out there that I'm really having a tough time deciding. What say you?
|
|||||||||||||||
seattlesetters
Optics Apprentice Joined: November/20/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 151 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
Zeiss Diavari. Hands down.
Better eye relief and bigger eybox.....and at least equal optics. On a boomer like that, the eye relief wins.
|
|||||||||||||||
Rancid Coolaid
MODERATOR Joined: January/19/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9318 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
Whatever the criteria and weighting, Diavari is definitely close to the top if not THE top. I have the 3-12x56 and it is great.
|
|||||||||||||||
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn. Equality is something you whine about not being given. |
|||||||||||||||
Dave Wilson
Optics Apprentice Joined: January/29/2009 Status: Offline Points: 88 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
my vote is for the Premier Heritage. i had the priviledge of looking through several of the best made, and to my eyes, the Premier was just better than the rest.
|
|||||||||||||||
Rancid Coolaid
MODERATOR Joined: January/19/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9318 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
For its intended purpose, it is indeed among the best; however, for hunting, unless the rifle is 12 pounds (which it may be), it wouldn't be my first choice. I have the Premier, it is indeed great, but a hunting scope, it is not. It could be made to work just fine in that roll, but that isn't the roll for which Premier made the scope. |
|||||||||||||||
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn. Equality is something you whine about not being given. |
|||||||||||||||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
I think you'd have to distinguish between the category of rifle scope to begin to answer that question. For instance, you'd probably get a different answer for tactical scopes vs. hunting scopes vs. benchrest shooting scopes vs. varmint scopes, etc. Then, the answer might even be different depending on the power range class.
In my humble opinion, based only on the brands I have experience with, I would probably go with the Zeiss Diavari as well, but I like what I've seen of the Swaro Z6, and one of my favorite scopes is a S&B Zenith 1.5-6X42 Flashdot. For hunting scopes, I think Zeiss, Swaro, and S&B are basically neck and neck and the decision between those would come down to power/objective size combinations and reticles based on what I wanted to use it for. For a "money is no object" tactical scope, I'd probably go with a Premier or maybe one of the new March 10:1 zoom scopes. Or, maybe I'd just get a Super Sniper and spend the money I saved on my rifle. I'd probably choose other brands for target, varmint, etc.
|
|||||||||||||||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
|||||||||||||||
safariarms man
Optics Apprentice Dolphin Overton Joined: June/28/2009 Location: K67BB Status: Offline Points: 111 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
Personally, not to knock the scopes you have chosen, which are well and good, but a sturdy fixed power 6x scope or a variable in the 2-7x range would be sufficient. I would choose a Leupold for your purposes in either the fixed or variable scope, in one of their top of the line scopes for that rifle. They have a great history of reliability for hard kickers, especially the fixed power scope, as well as their variables, with good CS. Their optics, despite their detractors are first rate and they are American made. Realistically, at all legal shooting light conditions there will be no difference. German scopes are great, no doubt about it, but the Leupold stands out in my opinion as a great scope compared to the price of the German made models.
|
|||||||||||||||
RONK
Optics Master Extraordinaire Joined: April/05/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3199 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
I have no valid experience with the very high end scopes, but I will suggest rethinking your choice of a magnification range if you will be hunting brown (Kodiak) bears. You do not want a low-end of 4x in the alders...
A 1-4X variable or the1.5-6X Flashdot Rifle Dude suggested would be a far more survivable choice.
|
|||||||||||||||
Urimaginaryfrnd
MODERATOR Resident Redneck Joined: June/20/2005 Location: Iowa Status: Offline Points: 14964 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
I'll second the idea that a low power variable like a 1.5-6x42 or something in the 2 to 2.5x range on the low end would be a better idea. Here is what I would want.
Edited by Urimaginaryfrnd - July/08/2009 at 00:33 |
|||||||||||||||
"Always do the right thing, just because it is the right thing to do". Bobby Paul Doherty Texas Ranger |
|||||||||||||||
JGRaider
Optics Master Joined: February/06/2008 Status: Offline Points: 1540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
My money is on the Diavari.
|
|||||||||||||||
safariarms man
Optics Apprentice Dolphin Overton Joined: June/28/2009 Location: K67BB Status: Offline Points: 111 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
I got to thinking about my post and felt guilty. To qualify things, while I have tons of experience with many calibers of rifles and many brands of scopes, I have never owned or shot a rifle with any that you mentioned, nor have ever shot an elk. Therefore, I felt compelled to qualify my earlier post. It was made based on my general hunting knowledge and vast reading about hunting elk and the type of optics needed. I still personally believe like the previous posters a lower upper end magnification would be better, as the lighter the scope is preferential and durability in still a major concern. Now with a rifle like you have, a nice upper, uber, end scope would be nice. rifledude seems to have experience with all the models in some form or fashion which is very helpful. I own a Trijicon and would not hesitate taking it with me, if it were a smaller model.
|
|||||||||||||||
Rancid Coolaid
MODERATOR Joined: January/19/2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9318 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
Additionally, Safari - and this is personal opinion based on experience, military and civilian: the words "best" and "leupold" almost NEVER go in the same sentence.
I'll hold my original post and say the Zeiss is still a great option. Lower power is a good thing for close-in targets, but something a little higher (too) would be good for a longer shot on elk or other. The 1.5-6 is about as good as it can get. |
|||||||||||||||
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn. Equality is something you whine about not being given. |
|||||||||||||||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
Also, keep in mind the OP included the qualifier "money is no object." When price is completely removed from consideration, value for $ spent becomes a non-issue and the focus becomes what's "the best" in an absolute sense. The performance of the best scopes may not be better in direct proportion to the price differential vs. some upper mid level scopes. Nevertheless, when money is no object, the best is still the best, no matter how slight the margin due to diminishing returns.
|
|||||||||||||||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
|||||||||||||||
cfusco
Optics GrassHopper Joined: July/07/2009 Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
Thanks for all the posts guys. Based on some of the comments here and on some comments from others, I am seriously leaning towards the Diavari in a 2.5 x 10. Although the Swaro in 1.7 x 10 is a close runner up.
I am ruling out the Schmidt and Bender based on weight, (20 oz for the S&B vs. 16oz for the Zeiss and 18 oz for the Swaro). And although I do love Leupolds I have more Leupolds than I can count. Plus since this is a custom rifle I wanted to add some pizzaz to it and go all out for a scope.
I'm heading to Cabela's now to check Zeiss and Swaro out side by side. But so far I'm liking the Zeiss.
Thanks for your help.
|
|||||||||||||||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
I have a 2.5-10X50 Diavari, and I can promise you, you wouldn't be at all disappointed in that scope. Then again, the 1.7-10X42 Z6 is an impressive scope as well, but it is quite a bit more expensive than the Zeiss.
|
|||||||||||||||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
|||||||||||||||
safariarms man
Optics Apprentice Dolphin Overton Joined: June/28/2009 Location: K67BB Status: Offline Points: 111 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
Just out of curiosity, who built your rifle on what action and so forth? What is the weight of the rifle? What type of elk hunting will you be doing, meaning, horseback, taken in as far as you can go by vehicular means and a lot of walking or taken to a remote area with little movement?
|
|||||||||||||||
cfusco
Optics GrassHopper Joined: July/07/2009 Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
The rifle is still being built. Dave Bruno out of Dayton, PA is building it. It is being built on a BAT action with a stainless Kreiger barrel, McMillan stock and coated with a polymer/ceramic finish from Falcon Gun Finishing. The whole rig before scope should way slightly over 7.5 lbs.
As for elk hunting, I do a variety of types of hunting - everything from spot and stalk from old logging roads to fly-ins to remote areas. My goal was to get a rifle light enough to handle various types of hunting but not so light that it punishes me when I pull the trigger. I think 7.5 lbs will be a happy medium.
Are you from Safari Arms Co.?
|
|||||||||||||||
RifleDude
MODERATOR EVIL OPPRESSOR Joined: October/13/2006 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 16337 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
Very nice!!! |
|||||||||||||||
Ted
Money can't buy happiness... but it's much more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than on a bicycle. |
|||||||||||||||
308WIN
Optics Apprentice Joined: February/28/2009 Status: Offline Points: 120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
my 2.5-10x42 zeiss diavari with #4 is the best scope i have ever owned. i have owned nightforce, s&B, swaro PH, conquest, leupys-various, etc....
|
|||||||||||||||
Kickboxer
MODERATOR Moderator Joined: February/13/2008 Status: Offline Points: 23679 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||||
I'll ++ on that, but I have not owned a NF, have used one, except for ruggedness ( I would not put the Zeiss on my .458 Lott, a NF I would) it is my favorite hunting scope of all. Of course, NF is for a different kind of hunting...
|
|||||||||||||||
Opinion,untempered by fact,is ignorance.
There are some who do not fear death... for they are more afraid of not really living |
|||||||||||||||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |