New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 42mm vs 50mm in low light
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

42mm vs 50mm in low light

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/01/2009 at 13:10
hossdaniels View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper

Joined: December/07/2008
Location: nc
Status: Offline
Points: 31
I've been looking for a scope that is good in low light. 
The extra objective size seems like a cheap way to improve low light performance.
Does that extra 8-10mm really make a noticable difference?
All I've ever had was 40mm, and was curious if it really helps in low light, or is it a gimmic?
I'm talking in $4-500 quality glass, VXIII, SIIB, Monarch, 4200.  I realize it my mount a little higher, but I dont "think" that would make enough of a difference to matter(maybe 1/4" difference right?).
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/01/2009 at 13:23
trigger29 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
X = 180 Y = 90 (X+Pyro)+(Y-Pyro) = ?

Joined: September/29/2007
Location: South Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 4248
The bigger objective will only make a difference at higher powers. At 10x a 50 mm will give you a 5mm exit pupil. The 42 mm will give you a 4.2 mm. you would get the same 5 mm exit pupil from the 42mm by dialing down to 8.4x. I can't really say how much difference it will make for you, it will depend on how big your pupils dialate. I can't see anything in the dark, with any amount of help, so some of this stuff doesn't help me much. Just throwing out what I know.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: January/02/2009 at 09:23
Cracker View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper

Joined: August/22/2007
Location: USA South East
Status: Offline
Points: 5

Couple weeks ago I compared two Zeiss Victory scopes.

One was 2.5-10x42, second was 2.5-10x50.

I was able to see exactly same line on the doctor eye chart for both scopes in very low light  ( was almost impossible to see) at magnification x10.

Basically 42mm and 50 mm doesn't make difference even on high power magnifications. I would say in that case it was even easier to recognize letters with 42 mm scope, because of reticle 0 ( it has just a plain dot in the middle).
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "42mm vs 50mm in low light"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Finnish low light scope test - 50mm scopes puppezed Rifle Scopes 9
40mm vs. 50mm in Low Light GunAround Rifle Scopes 7
z3 42mm or 50mm? Robster80 Rifle Scopes 6
42mm Objective compared to a 50mm Objective blt65 Rifle Scopes 5
42mm vs 50mm txhunter2 Rifle Scopes 15
Need low light, light weight rifle scope ElkMan Rifle Scopes 1 4/29/2004 3:26:17 AM
Good low-light Hunting Scope? luke_duke Rifle Scopes 34
Meopta discontinued R2 low light scopes dw0229 Rifle Scopes 9
low light scope StrangeHighways Rifle Scopes 4
Low light Binoculars bhaven Binoculars 19

This page was generated in 0.344 seconds.