New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 4200 4-16X50 VS Sightron SII BS 4-16X42
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

4200 4-16X50 VS Sightron SII BS 4-16X42

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/22/2009 at 22:10
piered456 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: October/22/2009
Status: Offline
Points: 4
The scope will go on my savage build. 308win. Target shooting only, 100-600yrds from bench and prone (F-class type shooting)
1. Tracking/holding zero is my #1 concern
2.Then glass
3.want a fine reticle (prefer etched but wire is not a deal breaker)
4. Open to other scopes in this price range.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/22/2009 at 22:49
skilly1979 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: February/18/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 84
step up to the big sky or slll series, the glass in the big sky is on par with the 4200, but the slll is clearly better than the 4200. tracking in both scopes are dead nutz on. great glass great adjustments.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/22/2009 at 22:54
piered456 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: October/22/2009
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Originally posted by skilly1979 skilly1979 wrote:

step up to the big sky or slll series, the glass in the big sky is on par with the 4200, but the slll is clearly better than the 4200. tracking in both scopes are dead nutz on. great glass great adjustments.
I was refering to the Big Sky. SII BS (BS for Big Sky)
Thank you for the reply. at this point I am leaning twords the Sightron Big Sky
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/24/2009 at 09:48
piered456 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: October/22/2009
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Come on guys I need some help here. I did a search and found some useful info on both scopes but haven't seen much in the way of a comparison of the two.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/24/2009 at 10:35
cheaptrick View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: September/27/2004
Location: South Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 20478
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/24/2009 at 13:33
piered456 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: October/22/2009
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Cheaptrick, I have already checked out the SWFA rating scale. My #1 concern is Tracking/Holding & return to zero. This was (I don't think ) not factored into the scale. Swfa has said that the sightron rated lower than the 4200 because of durability and lack of features. Since the scope will be going on a range gun (no field use) I think the sightron will be plenty durable enough. Neither scope have all the features that I want but none of there shortcomings are deal breakers.
I would also like to add the Nikon Monarch to this list.
Sightron Big Sky 4x16x42 ,VS. Bushnell 4200 4x16x50 ,VS. Nikon Monarch 4x16x50
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/24/2009 at 19:29
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Online
Points: 10977
I would take Sightron S2 Big Sky and Elite 4200 over Monarch, personally.

If you plan to use high magnification, larger objective lens makes a difference, so Elite 4200 has an edge there.  Also, Elite 4200 has side focus, while 4-16x42 S2BS has AO.

In that regard, Sightron's 4.5-14x44 is probably a better match due to a slightly larger objective lens and side focus.

As far as tracking goes, I've never had a problem with my Sightrons, but similarly, I've never had a problem with Elite 4200.  I thin Sightron S2BS has a larger adjustment range which gives me a little more flexibility, but within 600 yards, it is probably not a big deal.

As far as reticle selection goes, I think Sightron has an edge since it offers several scope with a fine Dot reticle.  I have a 6-24x42 Big Sky with a dot reticle and find to be superb for target shooting.

ILya
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/28/2009 at 20:59
PaulD View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: October/01/2009
Location: Alaska
Status: Offline
Points: 14
Originally posted by koshkin koshkin wrote:

In that regard, Sightron's 4.5-14x44 is probably a better match due to a slightly larger objective lens and side focus.
 
ILya
 
I don't see a 4.5-14x44 Sightron model offering.  They offer a 4.5-14 in both 42mm and 50mm objective.
 
Were you thinking Zeiss Conquest's 4.5-14x44mm?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/29/2009 at 01:25
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Online
Points: 10977
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/29/2009 at 02:11
PaulD View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: October/01/2009
Location: Alaska
Status: Offline
Points: 14
Ahh...  Now I see.  Thanks for pointing that out.  44mm
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/29/2009 at 20:29
257WM_CDL-SF View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: March/18/2009
Location: NC
Status: Offline
Points: 181
both are great scopes Ive never looked through both at same time,But I might give the Big Sky the edge ,But both are wonderful scopes
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/29/2009 at 21:59
Randall45 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: June/25/2009
Status: Offline
Points: 284
Originally posted by 257WM_CDL-SF 257WM_CDL-SF wrote:

both are great scopes Ive never looked through both at same time,But I might give the Big Sky the edge ,But both are wonderful scopes
I have looked through both scopes and the S2 Big Sky has the edge over the Bushnell Elite 4200.
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "4200 4-16X50 VS Sightron SII BS 4-16X42"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Just got my Sightron SII BS 4-16X42 mildo ougunnut Rifle Scopes 7 6/6/2007 7:53:56 PM
Sightron SII VS Monarch VS Elite 4200 horsesandhorns Rifle Scopes 14 10/16/2007 6:47:44 AM
Elite 4200 or Sightron SII horsesandhorns Rifle Scopes 4 3/18/2007 10:38:58 PM
bushnell 4200 vs sightron sII tttpuls Varmint Scopes 4 8/10/2006 7:48:55 PM
Which is better: Bushnell 4200 or Sightron SII cletus85 Rifle Scopes 13
Thoughts on Sightron SII 4-16x42 AO tpcollins Rifle Scopes 1
Bushnell 4200, Nikon Monarch, Sightron SII 3-9x40 thebookdoc Rifle Scopes 11
Low Mags : Conquest / 4200 / SII-Big Sky / VX-3 akula88 Rifle Scopes 15
SII Big Sky vs Elite 4200 vs Conquest brencat Rifle Scopes 12
Sightron SII vs Bushnell 4200 cletus85 Rifle Scopes 10


This page was generated in 0.375 seconds.