New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 3-9x40 glass quality ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

3-9x40 glass quality ?

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2011 at 20:34
03mossy View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: March/03/2010
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 180
One of my guns needs a new 3-9x40 for deer hunting. I don't have a big budget this time so I am wondering which of these has better glass...?

Burris FFII

Redfield revolution

Nikon Buckmasters

Thanks
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2011 at 20:42
3_tens View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar

Joined: January/08/2007
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7180
Of the 3 you have listed I would go with the Burris. You may want to put some serious thought to the Vortex Viper 2-7 It is an excellent scope for the $149 discounted price. I was floored by the quality when I got one.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2011 at 20:46
slowr1der View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: March/25/2010
Status: Offline
Points: 247
Burris by far imo. 
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/18/2011 at 21:37
m_freeman View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: August/07/2009
Status: Offline
Points: 69
If you can step up a little Zeiss Conquest at $399  is an amazing value, with transferable lifetime warranty. Solid quality build and very good glass, it will do anything expected of a 3x9x40 and more.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/19/2011 at 12:49
03mossy View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: March/03/2010
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 180
Originally posted by m_freeman m_freeman wrote:

If you can step up a little Zeiss Conquest at $399  is an amazing value, with transferable lifetime warranty. Solid quality build and very good glass, it will do anything expected of a 3x9x40 and more.


I would really like to step up to the Zeiss but this time I need to keep the price down.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/19/2011 at 14:21
ArtP View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: September/04/2011
Status: Offline
Points: 26

I have owned two FFII's and really liked them.  Both mine were blurry around the edges, but for the money found that acceptable and not so noticeable in the field.  If I were facing your decision today, I'd have a hard look at the Redfield in person, then decide between the FFII & Redfield.

I owned a VV in 2-7, but sold it in favor of a more expensive scope.  I think any of the three mentioned are certainly at the top of the heap in the sub $200 category.  I'm pretty sure the Redfield is American made, while the other two are made in the Philippines.
 
I did own a Nikon Monarch, which is a step up from the Buckmaster.  I wasn't impressed - the FFII was better at half the price.  I can't help wonder if my Monarch was a lemon, but I didn't want to bother dealing with Nikon over qualities that were intangible.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/19/2011 at 17:40
silver View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master


Joined: November/04/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2291
Redfield is American owned, by Leupold.  Where it is made...  Where its parts come from...
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/19/2011 at 18:13
billyburl2 View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar

Joined: January/08/2009
Location: Cottonwood, AZ
Status: Offline
Points: 3872
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/20/2011 at 18:57
powderburn View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman


Joined: April/09/2010
Status: Offline
Points: 345
I'd second the burris recommendation. My buddy has a redfield and it is fine too. Really all of the scopes mentioned are pretty decent and somewhat comparable.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/20/2011 at 22:45
slowr1der View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: March/25/2010
Status: Offline
Points: 247
Originally posted by ArtP ArtP wrote:

I did own a Nikon Monarch, which is a step up from the Buckmaster.  I wasn't impressed - the FFII was better at half the price.  I can't help wonder if my Monarch was a lemon, but I didn't want to bother dealing with Nikon over qualities that were intangible.
I don't think you got a lemon, because I too own two Monarchs and 2 FFII's and have owned several more FFII's in the past and honestly, to my eyes the Burris has better glass than either of the Monarchs. That being said, the Monarch does have better turrets imo as you can reset them to zero, but they also cost quite a bit more, and like I said, the FFII's have better glass imo. If I was buying a scope again for a hunting rifle, I'd honestly buy a FFII unless I got a great deal in a Monarch, which I did when I got mine.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/21/2011 at 11:26
Sparky View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire


Joined: July/15/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 3190
Originally posted by 3_tens 3_tens wrote:

Of the 3 you have listed I would go with the Burris. You may want to put some serious thought to the Vortex Viper 2-7 It is an excellent scope for the $149 discounted price. I was floored by the quality when I got one.


I would strongly be looking at the Vortex Viper as well. Its a great scope. And I would not let the fact that it is being discontinued bother me. And the magnification range is not that much different from the 3-9 you are looking at. Plus 2x on the low end may be a benefit since it will give you a wider field of view.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/21/2011 at 12:08
03mossy View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: March/03/2010
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 180
Would I be loosing alot of low light performance going from a 40mm obj. down to the 32mm of the Viper?
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/23/2011 at 01:46
31 bertram View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: January/15/2011
Location: Gulf Shores, Al
Status: Offline
Points: 57
I put a Burris 3x9x40 FF II on my rifle years ago as a temporary and it's still on my gun, I love that scope, it has been tougher than nails.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/23/2011 at 05:32
ebow86 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: September/19/2011
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 72

edit double post



Edited by ebow86 - September/23/2011 at 05:33
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/23/2011 at 05:33
ebow86 View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: September/19/2011
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 72
Originally posted by 03mossy 03mossy wrote:

Would I be loosing alot of low light performance going from a 40mm obj. down to the 32mm of the Viper?
 

I would be inclined to say yes, there would be a noticeable difference.

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/23/2011 at 08:37
300S&W View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar

Joined: January/27/2008
Location: Burlington,WV
Status: Offline
Points: 10592
Originally posted by ebow86 ebow86 wrote:

Originally posted by 03mossy 03mossy wrote:

Would I be loosing alot of low light performance going from a 40mm obj. down to the 32mm of the Viper?
 

I would be inclined to say yes, there would be a noticeable difference.

 
  Maybe not.  You've got to take into consideration the lens/coatings differences of higher priced/quality scopes.  At one time that Viper would have once cost you close to $300 so we're talking a scope in a higher class than the others mentioned. I can tell you that when my Viper is set at 4x it compares favorably with my 4x32 Conquest.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/23/2012 at 14:54
03mossy View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice


Joined: March/03/2010
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 180
I ended up finding a store that still had the Bushnell Elite 4200 3-9x40 for $199 so I went that route. Thanks for all your help
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/23/2012 at 16:19
WYcoyote View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: April/06/2010
Location: Kane,WY
Status: Offline
Points: 154
Originally posted by 03mossy 03mossy wrote:

I ended up finding a store that still had the Bushnell Elite 4200 3-9x40 for $199 so I went that route. Thanks for all your help
 
You done good.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/23/2012 at 18:28
RotoReuter_DM View Drop Down
Optics Apprentice
Optics Apprentice
Avatar

Joined: December/09/2011
Location: WI
Status: Offline
Points: 296
Good choice!
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/23/2012 at 21:54
ckk1106 View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master
Avatar

Joined: December/14/2007
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Points: 1435
Originally posted by 03mossy 03mossy wrote:

I ended up finding a store that still had the Bushnell Elite 4200 3-9x40 for $199 so I went that route. Thanks for all your help

Thunbs Up  Better than all three in your original post. 
Thunbs Up
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/23/2012 at 22:35
Sparky View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire


Joined: July/15/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 3190
Good choice.

Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/23/2012 at 22:37
EAGLE View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman


Joined: August/08/2011
Status: Offline
Points: 332
+5 4200

Eagle
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "3-9x40 glass quality ?"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Glass Glass Quality- Zeiss Conquest VS Trijicon YakAk Rifle Scopes 10
Glass quality: conquest vs SIII vs 4200 Lennyo3034 Rifle Scopes 5
Leica Duovid vs.Ultravid Glass Quality Swoyer Binoculars 3 3/17/2007 2:21:09 PM
Does higher quality glass help fight mirage? maj paine Tactical Scopes 10
Trijicon Accupoint - Glass Quality Bad Bob Rifle Scopes 5
Glass quality of Vortex Viper mlgs00 Target 19
Price range = glass quality Shooter31 Rifle Scopes 6
Trying to balance glass quality and magnification CALL911 Rifle Scopes 24
Glass Quality Viper VS Viper PST 308 Sav Rifle Scopes 0
quality glass? cementhead Target 6


This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.