New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 3200 VS. Buckmaster
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

3200 VS. Buckmaster

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/20/2009 at 12:02
JNOS View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: October/20/2009
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1
i have a 7mm rem mag and can't decide between the Bushnell 3200 and a Nikon Buckmaster, both in 3-9x40.  what do you guys think?

thanks in advance,
JNOS
< id="gwProxy" ="">< ="jsCall;" id="jsProxy" ="">
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/20/2009 at 12:59
DAVE44 View Drop Down
Optics Journeyman
Optics Journeyman
Avatar

Joined: November/11/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 652
I would say they are optically close, but the 3200 has RAINGAURD and I think the newer models have a true one piece tube and saddle for the adjustments. The Buckmasters have more eye relief usually. If you go to a 3200 3-10 x40 you can have the extra eye relief too!
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/20/2009 at 16:15
lucytuma View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar

Joined: November/25/2007
Location: Wisconsin
Status: Offline
Points: 5389
+1 on the 3200, though for a few dollars more you can have the Nikon Primos.
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "3200 VS. Buckmaster"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
There are no similar posts.
Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.230 seconds.