New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 308 for Elk
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Check GunBroker.com for SWFA's No Reserve and No Minimum bid firearm auctions.

308 for Elk

 Post Reply Post Reply   Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/17/2008 at 11:10
ssf467 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper
Avatar

Joined: January/16/2008
Location: Junction
Status: Offline
Points: 44
I've killed a few Elk with a 308, any ideas on a good load? I've used 180 gr factory loads.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/17/2008 at 11:41
pyro6999 View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
OT TITAN

Joined: December/22/2006
Location: North Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 22024
imr 4895 or imr 4064 usually work in any .308 based case
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/17/2008 at 12:04
lucytuma View Drop Down
Optics Jedi Knight
Optics Jedi Knight
Avatar

Joined: November/25/2007
Location: Wisconsin
Status: Offline
Points: 5389
I think your both on the right track , as far as powder and bullet selection are concerned.  I'm going to receive some flack for this, but I believe you could also look at a well constructed 165gr. bullet also.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/17/2008 at 12:08
pyro6999 View Drop Down
Optics Retard
Optics Retard
Avatar
OT TITAN

Joined: December/22/2006
Location: North Dakota
Status: Offline
Points: 22024
i wont disagree with you on that in fact i always used 150gr bullets in my 30-06 for elk
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/17/2008 at 12:19
tahqua View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Have You Driven A Ford Lately?

Joined: March/27/2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 8043
I prefer the 4895 and 4064, too.  I load the Sierra Game Kings in 165 and 180 grain, but I don't hunt elk,  though the .308 is a solid choice for most big game IMO.
Presently most of my brass is Federal and Remington. I wouldn't use all the 7.62 brass I have for hunting. The Federal 210 primers are working real well and I don't know if a different one would make that much difference for hunting.

Good luck


Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: February/17/2008 at 12:44
RifleDude View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: October/13/2006
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 14312
Try using between 42.0 - 45.0 gr. 4064 behind a good, stoutly constructed 165 grain bullet.  Start with 42 gr charge and work your way up gradually in 1/2 grain increments, checking for signs of pressure and select the charge that groups best in your rifle.  Once you do that, play with seating depth from about 0.020" off the lands (if your magazine box length will permit), gradually seating deeper in 0.005" increments until you find the "sweet spot" for your rifle.  Then, go shoot an elk!Smile
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: July/24/2008 at 20:04
publius View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: February/25/2004
Status: Offline
Points: 13
165gr. Barnes X if your gun shoots it well. If not a 180gr. Nosler Partition.
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/07/2008 at 11:38
Sgt. D View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar

Joined: February/20/2008
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Points: 3640
This may be better posted in the firearms thread but since you are talking 308 I wanted to tap your experience. Years ago I customized a enfield 308 by fitting it in a silhouette bench stock and after market scope mount. The job went well and it looked good, BUT! the thing would stomp the      out of you. It was accurate for what it was but simply no fun to shoot. I wasn't loading for 308 so factory ammo was my only option and 150 gr. was what was available at the time. My question is with your newer set up and better choice of ammo do you see significant change in recoil from a 150 gr round to a 165 or 180? I know you see a noticeable increase, but does it get to the point that 5 or 6 rounds and your done? I've shot 7 mag and 300 win mag that are a breeze and nothing compared to that enfield. The remark " kills on both ends" wasn't far off. Crutch
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)     Back to Top Direct Link To This Post Posted: August/07/2008 at 14:10
RONK View Drop Down
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Optics Master Extraordinaire
Avatar

Joined: April/05/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3199

 I've always been fascinated by how some rifles are sweet to shoot while others in the same chambering, same load, etc. will pound the heck out of you.

I'm sure most of it is a matter of stock fit and balance, but I'm equally sure that there are other factors at play that nobody's thought of yet!

 As far as loads go, I would work up any decent hunting bullet in the 165 or 180 class, preferably a premium grade bullet if you lean toward the lighter weights.

 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Similar Threads: "308 for Elk"
Subject Author Forum Replies Last Post
Good 308 Scope and 308 Drop YWHIC Rifle Scopes 3
factory 308 hunting ammo stork23raz Reloading & Ballistics 28
308 scope under 350 opinions 805stormtrooper Rifle Scopes 15
308 Riflescope Suggestion for a newbie Sublight Rifle Scopes 6
7mm08 or 308 stilhuntin Firearms 274
Short barrel 308 ammo recommendations Lockjaw Reloading & Ballistics 33
308 AND CFE 223??? Lockjaw Reloading & Ballistics 3
custom 308 for sale ccoker Firearms For Sale 9
Wilson Combat 308 2-600 yard video ccoker Firearms 8
saiga 308 davidfl Rifle Scopes 7


This page was generated in 0.235 seconds.