OpticsTalk by SWFA, Inc. Homepage SWFA     SampleList.com
Forum Home Forum Home > Scopes > Varmint Scopes
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 2.5-10x56 trijicon accupoint on AR?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Visit the SWFA.com site to check out our current specials.

2.5-10x56 trijicon accupoint on AR?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
shooter2440 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: September/29/2016
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote shooter2440 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 2.5-10x56 trijicon accupoint on AR?
    Posted: September/29/2016 at 15:15
Hello,

I have been hoping to get some thoughts from users in this forum. I am completing my AR build and have kicked around the idea of going after the trijicon 2.5-10x56 accupoint to put on my rifle. I plan on using this gun for coyote and hog.

I became attracted to the 2.5-10 because of the large objective lens, giving me large field of view. I intend to zero it at 50 yards (so it shoots at flat again at around 200yds again, and only slightly high at 100), since I will not plan on making shots exceeding 250 yards.

My only question is: has anyone experienced any issues with a 56mm, or similarly large, objective? Since it sits higher from the barrel, can i anticipate issues with shots somewhere between 25 and 250 yards?

I am interested in the 2.5-10 because the low end power is lower than trijicon's 3-9x40, and the objective is larger.



Back to Top
supertool73 View Drop Down
Optics God
Optics God
Avatar
Superstool

Joined: January/03/2008
Status: Offline
Points: 11500
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote supertool73 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/29/2016 at 16:19
a larger objective actually has nothing to do with larger FOV. 

It will be brighter in low light at a higher mag than the 3-9x40 scope

But as far as cleaning the objective.  That shouldn't be an issue as long as you use a typical height AR mount. 
Lifetime warranty and excellent customer service don't mean a thing when your gun fails during a zombie attack.

"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own."
Back to Top
shooter2440 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: September/29/2016
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote shooter2440 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/29/2016 at 16:30
Thank you for correcting me, much appreciated. I'll probably end up throwing it in a Bobro mount. I appreciate the input. I just didn't want to overlook some issue that may come with a large objective.
Back to Top
anweis View Drop Down
Optics Master
Optics Master


Joined: January/29/2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1044
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote anweis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: September/29/2016 at 17:51
Rifles are like violins. They need to fit if you are to play well. Every single time i tried to shoot from field positions a rifle with a large scope representing 1/4 of the total weight of the rifle positioned well over the bore line i found that the rifle had a poor balance and i shot poorly. 
As soon as i switched to a better balanced rifle with a smaller lighter scope i had no problem hitting the gong. 
Just this morning i shot a .375 with a small low mounted scope at 200 yards (seated, kneeling, leaning, and prone). I hit 60 out of 60 times into the 6" gong. When the rifle had a high mounted 50 mm scope (high rings), i hit less often.  
If you carry the concrete shooting bench with you in the woods, it makes no difference.
Just something to think about.
Back to Top
Rancid Coolaid View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar

Joined: January/19/2005
Location: United States
Status: Online
Points: 9243
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rancid Coolaid Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/11/2016 at 21:35
I have owned both, used both quite a bit in the field. The 3-9 is plenty bright and much smaller, I still have it. The 2.5-10 sat on a 16" barrel AR that was always run suppressed, weight wasn't the primary issue, but it is a large scope for such a small gun, just be aware.

Both are great in low light.
Freedom is something you take.
Respect is something you earn.
Equality is something you whine about not being given.
Back to Top
koshkin View Drop Down
MODERATOR
MODERATOR
Avatar
Dark Lord of Optics

Joined: June/15/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 12880
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote koshkin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/12/2016 at 13:41
The 2.5-10x56 is a nice scope if you plan to use it in very low light.  It is a bit heavy and on most ARs, it would not be my choice.  However, if this is for night use, then it is a good way to go.

ILya
Back to Top
shooter2440 View Drop Down
Optics GrassHopper
Optics GrassHopper


Joined: September/29/2016
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote shooter2440 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: October/19/2016 at 13:13
Thanks for the feedback.

My rifle has a 16" barrel and a Magpul PRS stock with the adjustable stock.

I intend to use this as a range, hog, and coyote rifle.

I am not too worried about the weight and I should be able to line up behind either scope with the adjustable stock so in that issue, I'm not too worried about the scope sitting a little high off the bore.

The 3-9x40 is a 1in. tube, 12.4in, weighing 13.4oz.

The 2.5-10x56 is 30mm tube, 13.8in., weighing 20.7 oz. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.219 seconds.